Baller skibug Posted October 3, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 3, 2010 This is the use of the adjective definition as it relates to slalom skiing - e : occurring or located near the outer limits of the playing area <hit to deep right field> This is just meant to be a fun and personal interest topic. Before anyone slams me on this one I will qualify my comment by saying I have never used the word "DEEP" to describe my progress in terms of line lengths and buoy count. I have skied a PPB with 1@35 / 34 mph. I consider myself quite the accomplished walley / hacker when it comes to skiing, which is not saying much. It is not menat to offend anyone that uses the word "DEEP" in the way described below. I was just wondering what all of the short line skiers think when they see the term used this way. I never felt the use of the word "DEEP" at longer line lengths was appropriate (PERSONAL OPINION). I have mental block and a physical choke if I even think of using it as a way to describe my set (e.g. "i got DEEP into 28'). Analogus to baseball, if running 38' off is a home run; then 28' off is like a blooper. Analogus to football, a deep bomb = 38' off would be something on the order of 50 - 60 yards or more. A 15 yard pass would not be called "DEEP". So, what is the appropriate line length to start using this term.....my personal opinion is 35' off and deep would be past 4.5 balls. Again, just for fun and no offense intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ForrestGump Posted October 3, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 3, 2010 IMO, Deep has nothing to do with where you are in your ability but is relative to where you are in the pass you are at. A Boys1 skier running his opener at 15.5mph could get deep into that pass by getting past 4 ball. IMO, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller skibug Posted October 3, 2010 Author Baller Share Posted October 3, 2010 OK...to qualify....only pertaining to 34 mph & 36 mph skiers of critical age 25 plus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h2odawg79 Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 I would agree with Shane. I also hate the thought of anything that might belittle anothers attemps or aspirations. I hope that anyone who is working on a particular line length/speed could always be proud of their Personal accomplishments and Goals and express their status anyway that feels Good. I don't feel that their efforts should ever be looked at or classified or otherwise "Judged" as "a blooper" and/or insignificant... If "Deep 22/30mph" is actually deep for that person on that pass. -Rejoice!  IMO, This sport is Hard enuf in every area and on every level to willingly help anyone feel that their Best efforts are unworthy or less then appreciated... For some, just getting out on the water is a Long Bomb or a HR, every time! -I can relate!!!   Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Horton Posted October 3, 2010 Administrators Share Posted October 3, 2010 any thing from 3.5 to 6 = deep. Goode ★ HO Syndicate ★ KD Skis ★ MasterCraft ★ PerfSki Radar ★ Reflex ★ S Lines ★ Stokes ★ Baller Video Coaching System Become a Supporting Member or make a One-time Donation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted October 3, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 3, 2010 Deep normally describes my starts. Head just barely above water at onset, disappears initially, then appears with a strained look on my face if I don't roll left (RFF). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ForrestGump Posted October 3, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 3, 2010 Again, deep is a term relative to a starting position on a particular pass and not relative to your ability as a whole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Ed_Obermeier Posted October 3, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 3, 2010 Ditto what Horton said. Most I ski with consider anything from 3.5 up as being "deep" into that particular line length. As with most descriptive terms it's all relative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller_ RichardDoane Posted October 3, 2010 Baller_ Share Posted October 3, 2010 getting "deep" can also mean when a skier "slams" a turn, and gets their body quite a ways into the water at the buoy.  Usually with a C3 setting on ZO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Than_Bogan Posted October 4, 2010 Gold Member Share Posted October 4, 2010 I think I'm sorta consistent in applying the following terms to the following ranges: 0.25 to 2: "into" 2.25 to 3: "mid" 3.25 to 5.5: "deep" 6: "ran" These usually only apply to a relatively good score -- i.e. the skier got reasonably close to potential. So for a guy who's best is a deep -28, 1.5 @ -28 would be called "got into -28." But for a guy who starts off the dock at -28, that would just be a poor round, and so none of the above terms would be used. Every so often I might find myself referring to "3" as deep, especially if that skier has been really stuck at 1-2, which is fairly common when learning a new line lengths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h2odawg79 Posted October 4, 2010 Share Posted October 4, 2010 I normally only "get into" my Jack & Coke. But, last w/e I was actually into it pretty "deep"...http://www.ballofspray.com/vanillaforum/js/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-wink.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller_ RichardDoane Posted October 4, 2010 Baller_ Share Posted October 4, 2010 we're gonna be "deep" into JimmyB's guacamole & chips this weekend at Imperial ! And the spicy carrots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ral Posted October 5, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 5, 2010 Deep = what you say when you get past 3 and want people thinking that you almost ran the pass... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Than_Bogan Posted October 5, 2010 Gold Member Share Posted October 5, 2010 that's pretty good ral. I may have to steal that.Totally random note: Everyone called my paternal grandfather R.A.L. -- including his children. Stood for Ralph Alcot Lester. He was a bit of a hard-living fellow, and died before I was born, but was moderately famous as one of the founders of the Greyhound Bus Company. I keep thinking of him when I see "ral." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Ed_Obermeier Posted October 5, 2010 Baller Share Posted October 5, 2010 RAL speaks the truth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now