Jump to content

D3 Fusion Rides 7-10


Horton
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

I had the flu last week and am not sure I am fully recovered. In other words I do not feel strong yet.

 

I am going to work on getting more level approaching the ball and reaching slower today. That along with a little more forward into on side should smooth out the rough edges.

 

The ski is better than it looks in this video. Before I moved the fin and got sick it felt way better. Now think I just need to get on the program. The ski is really good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

I tweaked the fin last night. Was way better than the videos above.

 

Will post fin numbers tonight.

 

When I get in a groove the Fusion is so freak'n smooth

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
How does it compare to X5/X5 Pro/RCX skis from D3. Each new version of that basic design always felt like slow evolution of a proven design to me, rather than all new in any way. Is the Fusion evolution of the basic D3 characteristics, or something all new?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

First of all I do not think RCX and X5 are really in the same family

 

With the Fusion they let a X7 and a Z7 bunk together. 9 months later the Fusion was born.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
My understanding is that they took the shape and rocker from one ski (X7 I think) and used bevels more like the other ski (Z7 I assume).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

My 67" Fusion settings

 

2.495 (I did not mean to be this shallow but I skied good last set so I am leaving it)

6.8980

.741 (flat)(I hate this measure method - do not trust it. Everyone should just get the slot caliper)

.755 (slot)

 

30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Jdarwin, flex on my RC was 156, 133, 93, 69 (flexed in June of this year) the Fusion was 150, 128, 88, 68 (factory tag); so i don't think that was it as the RC is actually stiffer. I can't put my finger on it. I have ridden KD 7000 CG (2001), CR7 Titanium (2005), X5 pro (2007), Nomad RC (2007), Z7ST (2010), and now Fusion (2011). The Fusion feels (to me) nothing like the others. I put two entirely different sets of numbers in the ski to feel it out; these were the same two sets of numbers I have had in the RC and Z7 ST. Both sets of nubmers in the RC and Z7 ST were "usable"; but neither worked for me in the Fusion. Maybe I got a bad one to ride; or, maybe I am just that screwed up as a skier. It just didn't work for me and I was surprised and dissapointed; because I was excited about it. Horton is obviously making it work; so I am sure there are people out there that will love it, just not me.

 

FWIW, One of the skis I tested was an Elite (much stiffer and faster than the RC) and ran up to my PPB 2@35 within 3 sets; so now I have broken the chain; I am on an O'brien.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
skibug - that's interesting. I would have thought the Fusion would be closer to the RC/RCX in "feel". All of the D3's I've skied have been set up very similar with regard to fin setting. Possibly, the Fusion is more than just a "tweaked" version of previous products.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Jdarwin, this was a 67" ski and I am usually on a 68"; but Paul Crawford said to ride the 67" first since I was on the edge of the weight range (200 lbs). I ran the fin short and deeper...like 6.880, 2.500 and did not like it at all. I could not run my opening pass (25' on a training loop rope; because 22' sucks behind the MC)...tried 3 times...could not get it to turn; felt like driving a pontoon boat. This surprised me, especially on a 67" which I should be able to turn easier than the 68".

 

I went longer and shallow..like 6.940, 2.465 and was able to run into 32'; but it was a ton of work and still did not feel like the ski wanted to turn; at least not like my RC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Ah ha! I'm about the same weight and I can not ride at 67". I would bet the same applies to you. Paul has pushed the 67's on me in the past since they went a bit wider w/ the the forebody of their skis and I have resisted. I did try a 67" Z7 when they first came out and sent it back for a 68". I felt like the 67" stayed under me and I could never move it out. I would recommend the 68". Horton's is a 67" and would not work for me. I would like to try one at some point but it would have to be a 68".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I understand your theory and agree that the 68" would proabably be better. I already bought the 67" (67.5" when measured along the bottom) Elite. This ski is fast cross course, casts out nicely, gets wide and turns just about as good as my RC. With a few conscious technique tweaks; I feel it will take me further.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...