Jump to content
Love what we do here at BallOfSpray? Help us keep it going! Your support means the world—click the link below to donate.
 

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=Y3CSX74PYYFUE

 

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators
Posted

I took two sets on the D3 Quest today. Considering the time of year it is hard to say too much because I am all screwed up by the menace known as winter. It is clear that the ski is wicked fast and makes a lot of angle. I rode it with and without wing. You want to ride this ski with a wing. You want to ride this ski.

After only 2 sets but I am pretty stoked about this ski.

 

 

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Baller
Posted
@Horton - At least you're skiing man and not bad at all for this time of year! Looking forward to more feedback on the Quest. Curious about the video zoom - can you bring it in closer or are you trying to hide the winter coat you put on this past season? haha - you are not alone if so!
  • Baller
Posted
I picked up a 67" Quest from Paul yesterday. I skied the first set on my existing 2011 X7 and the second set on the Quest. After the first pass on the Quest, my son told me it looked smoother with more angle than he had ever seen me. I noticed that the ski immediately was stable, got great angle on both sides with little effort, accelerated all the way thru the wakes with little effort and had me in better position coming into each buoy. I had standard fin settings and I ride double hardshells and had the front 29.5" from the tail of the ski. It felt extremely comfortable and I noticed I was lesss tired at the end of the set than I was on my first set using my old ski. It felt like I had to work significantly less harder to ski on the Quest. I think there are going to be some great comments coming in on the Quest as more people try it!
  • Administrators
Posted
I got 1 ride on the ski today with different settings. Much smoother and flowing than yesterday. I liked it yesterday but felt like I have to get used to it. today I didn't think about the ski at all. it just flowed underneath me
  • Administrators
Posted

@Ral there were two D3 reps out this weekend. Saturday was Doug's settings and Sunday was Bob' settings. I know that does not help. I think Bob's number are right on bone stock.

 

I am sure that if I had video from today it would look way better than the video at the top of this page. (Bob's settings!)

 

@Gregy Yes

  • Administrators
Posted

Just to wrap this up. I got three sets total on the ski. That is no where near enough for a review but I can say that I think this is a very refined slalom ski. It is the kind of ski that lets you worry about your skiing not what the ski is doing.

 

This exact ski is going to Mexico next week without me but I hope to get a ski to review soon.

 

  • Administrators
Posted
@MS not exactly. On some skis I do better with it on some skis I do better without. As I've always said 34 mile an hour skiers should try it.
  • Baller_
Posted
Your trend lately has been liking the wing. The more you ski with the wing on your own ski, the harder time you will have skiing without it on your test skis.
  • Baller
Posted

I sometimes get overly excited about first impressions so I have been holding back on this a bit. This weekend I got what I consider the first 3 rides of the season on my white top Quest, and I could not stop smiling. I am more excited to ski right now than I have been in years. I think ski companies improve their skis with every update at least incrementally. Sometimes they succeed in a step change. This ski feels like a step change and like the ski I think D3 have been working for years to build. I have heard and believe it is very hard to find the right combination of design elements that makes a ski match the designers vision, but the boys are buzzing with excitement around how this ski turned out. Beyond all that, these are my skier observations as I avoid starting my workday because I just can’t wait to ski again…

 

1) This ski will allow you to grab a lot of angle, but it’s easy for the skier to choose how much. Ride the line you are on, take a bit more, let it run a bit long, and always get a sweet turn. I feel I have more freedom than ever before with no negative consequence

 

2) The next thing I notice is how quick it is side to side. It’s definitely faster than my X7 and maybe as fast as a Fusion. I notice it accelerating out of the turn and as I carry speed into and through the next buoy

 

3) It’s easier to get the ski moving out through the edge change. I am thinking that is largely due to the 2 things above but like it a lot in any case

 

This is the way I always wanted my ski to feel and I can’t wait to get fit and for the weather to warm up to see how these observations pay off at my shortest line lengths.

 

Posted
@Horton PLEASE STOP THE SKI TESTS, my wallet cannot keep up with this, I owe the IRS, my parents, the bank, my girlfriend, people I don't even know and now I want a new ski! How can I even start to justify this?? Who the heck cares, I'm going to demo a Quest. Damn you Mr Horton!
  • Administrators
Posted

@04196

I had two friends call me to day asking if I knew when they could get a Quest.

I called D3 and lucky for you skis are are shipping every day. Do you need the phone #?

  • Baller
Posted

@skidawg I think so. 2.515, 6.940tips, 0.750flat, 7 degrees, and 30 1/16" on my Reflex. I have not played with it at all, and so far dont feel like I have too. When it warms up and I am working on short lines I will play around to make sure I have the best setup.

 

Cant wait to hear what you think! Especially compared to your Fusion.

  • Baller
Posted
@Sully, what settings are you using? In any case, give the ski some sets. Mine did even turn before the buoy a couple of times, but when you get it, it FREAKING ROCKS!!!!
  • Baller
Posted
@Sully, so you're using 6.950"? I am on a 67", and using 6.913" instead of the recommeded 6.940". I would go shorter, especially if you feel too much ski in the water for the onside.
  • Baller
Posted
We played w/ the Quest a bit today. Again, it's early in the season and the water temp is low 60's but I believe the ski is more user friendly than the Fusion. Quick across course and a more predictable turning ski. The 6.940 length coupled with the 2.515 depth is WAY too much fin surface area. Backed up to 6.920 / 2.510 and it was much better but still too much fin IMO. I believe the correct numbers will be 6.910-6.915 and 2.505 to 2.508 depth. The DFT is fine. Not sure why D3 recommends such long/deep fin numbers. The 30" binding position seems about right. An 1/8" forward/back to taste. I believe this ski will satisfy many more skiers than the Fusion did. The Fusion required a bit more techinical application to perform consistently. Not a bad thing if you are a technical skier. But for the rest of us, the Quest is a much better performing platform that allows for some movement without overreacting. I'm looking forward to warmer water and tweaking the ski to bring out its full capabilities.
Posted
Okay, two more sets down and I must have changed my skiing some how. I skied very well today on the quest. Kept the fin at stock 68" X7 settings. I don't like to move my fin too much without giving it several sets between tweaks. I'll try to move the fin forward and a little less depth tomorrow just to see how the ski responds. Overall I am very impressed.
  • Baller
Posted
@jdarwin that may be way too much fin. Its the only thing I have tried yet and it felt good to me. D3 are getting all the feedback now on how fin settings are working out in the field and they will revise the stock numbers it if it makes sense. My guess is PC will tell you stock or shorter and more shallow than stock just as others have said above
  • Baller
Posted

Kevin - Ward can chime in here but the stock numbers (67") seemed like a lot of fin. That will only be amplified as the water warms up. Once the water hits 85 and higher, we typically end up around 6.905 - 6.917 length and 2.500 to 2.508x depth on every D3 since the RC. BTW, the ski is a 67" and the DFT is .750.

 

@ral - I think you are on track. I was tempted to just put my typical numbers but since there was so much "new" about this ski, we thought stock was the correct initial setting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...