Jump to content

Ski Settings Public Data Log


Gloersen
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

Another attempt at an open sharing ski settings log.

 

Mainly interested in what others end up with on the T3, but all data welcome.

 

Of course DFT comparisons will vary but may still provide a general idea; length and depth comparisons should be close.

 

It is likely to get all jacked up, I believe @Horton tried it before with no reasonable results, but worth another go?

 

The form is easy to complete, write-in fields in place where needed (such as dual depths/Denali).

 

Two links; one to the data entry form, the other to the resultant data log

LINKS:

 

Data Entry Form

 

Data Log

 

Thanks for contributing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@Gloersen cool stuff. my efforts failed largely because I chose the wrong software way back when. That and it's really hard to get people to do what you want and the way you envision it. I like your approach. Let me know if I can help you in any way.

 

I see you're asking for BallOfSpray usernames. If you're thinking about some kind of authentication against those usernames we should talk about it offline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Could be a really cool tool if enough people use it. I input the final setting on the last 3 ski's I've owned to help build it.

 

On a side note... I think it would be faster and simpler if the measurements were just manual inputs instead of selections. I also think the comments section might look a little cleaner if it was a wider column. Maybe add a column for speed and/or typical line length groups? Could even lump them together like 32mph or less, 34mph, and 36mph... 15off to 22off, 28off to 35off, 38off and up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Waternut, thanks for the data and the suggestions. Maybe a few less entries in the list will result in less scrolling. I’ll do it if I can format the “type in" fields to result in the right numbers, though if the number is in the list it is convenient to just click on it.

 

Insofar as speed and line length I concur, but thought the comments field would suffice; e.g. PB=3@38off/34.2, etc.

 

@lpskier, John I’m not sure why your entries wouldn’t be submitted. I suspect some field entries were missed; all are “required” except comments, height, weight, and front binding type. Likely the “technique” (caliper) entries didn’t have a circle filled for each column of every row (4 rows x 6 columns). The “percent complete” status bar at the bottom will be removed as it reads "100% complete" inaccurately all the time.

 

Perhaps try again if you prefer, thanks!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...