Jump to content

2016 Connelly GT review


Horton
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

Intro
The GT is the latest in a long line of skis from Connelly whose design heritage can be directly linked to the Connelly F1 that Jamie Beauchesne rode to the top of the slalom world a decade ago. The F1 evolved into the Prophecy. The first generation Prophecy (2008) was an aggressive and quirky ski. By 2013, the Prophecy had evolved into a much more refined and balanced ski. In 2015, the Prophecy was reworked to become the GT. Below is the BallOfSpray review of the 2016 Connelly GT.

http://www.ballofspray.com/images/2016/untitled-263.JPG

General Feel
The 2016 Connelly GT may be the easiest and the most consistent turning ski reviewed to date. This ski is basically fool proof at the buoy. The GT rides deeper in the water than many other high end skis. This attribute contributes to its amazing forgiveness at the buoy as well as an overall feeling of stability.

Toe Side (Off Side) Turn
The off side turn on the GT is one of the great joys of water skiing. The stability of the ski makes it easy for the skier to move forward approaching the buoy, to arc in early, and to carry ample speed back to the wakes.

The GT is far less sensitive to weight distribution approaching Off Side than any ski previously tested from Connelly.

Heel Side (On Side) Turn
On Side turns on the GT are noticeably quicker and sharper than the Prophecy. The ski can be turned with the skier’s weight slightly farther back than expected. The ski is so forgiving approaching on side that skiers need to be too careful to not become accustomed to staying back.

http://www.ballofspray.com/images/2016/untitled-279.JPG

 

From Second Wake to Ball
The fact that the GT rides deep in the water means that the ski is stable from the second wake to the ball and that it bleeds speed very quickly. The trade-off is that without adequate body alignment at the wakes and rope tension (aka “connection” or “handle control”) through the edge change and out to the ball line, the GT may slow down faster than preferred and draw a narrow path to the ball. At longer rope lengths this behavior is unnoticeable, but as the rope approaches 37 ½ feet in length, the skier needs to exert discipline and strength in order to achieve an optimal path from the wakes to the ball.

Provided the skier does exert the aforementioned rope tension and water speed is maintained, the GT will carve a smooth path wide and early in front of the ball. Skiers who do not maintain enough rope tension will find the path from ball to ball to be somewhat frantic. As forgiving as the ski is at the ball, it is equally unforgiving to poor rope tension from the wake to the ball.

From Ball to Second Wake
The GT is more of a stable ski than a fast ski. The strength of this ski is its ability turn and carry speed back to the inside. It does not generate as much additional speed from the ball to the wakes as many other skis in the category.

Conclusion
In a perfect world, the best turning ski would also be the ski that gets widest with the least effort. In the real world, ski designers have to compromise. The GT is a fantastic turning ski because it rides deep. The trade-off is that it is not the fastest high end ski. At 35 off and beyond, skiers that excel at keeping a tight line to the ball will love this ski, and skiers who struggle with this skill will struggle with this ski.

Quirks
The fin box is an old school design that is a bit painful to use. A new fin box from Connelly has been promised soon.

Binding placement and fin settings are critical for all high end tournament skis. Some skis are more sensitive than others. The GT is surprisingly insensitive to settings. This does not mean that you can put the fin and bindings anywhere without consequence, but the margin of error is remarkable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@Horton Nice write up, can you let us know how you went with the different fin numbers? From what I gather your at the other end of the spectrum from where I am - forward shallow long. And bindings?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@aussiemc Let's see: 75, minus 37.5 = 37.5 , x .3048 = 11.4m = right around the half-loop after 38 off (the little dawg). I'd say that requires some discipline anyway. Or, Good till 3@38?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member

That poll does not imply preference. I would much prefer that we all embrace a non-obsolete measurement system and tell how long the rope actually is.

 

However, the system I currently think in is the stupid one, because almost everyone I talk to uses said stupid system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I've had a very early f1, early prophecy and a 12 prophecy. Now I want a GT...

 

However @horton are you saying this ski is deep in the water and therefore more heavy and tiring than many other current skis? My 12 prophecy is good it the old f1 was exhausting after one 4 passes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@GregHind compared to an F1 it is a freaking rocketship. 2012 Prophecy was grey all carbon & PU core? Yea GT is WAY faster.

 

Not as fast as some other new skis but faster than those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...