Jump to content

Why is 41 So Hard?


AdamCord
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

Over the past month or so I've been skiing mostly at 34mph because I want to try and catch f*@#ing @adamhcaldwell as he just dominates at 34mph. It turns out that 41 is a really short rope, and anyone who has gotten through it at ANY speed is an absolute legend.

 

I was looking at some video from a set yesterday and trying to really see why the jump from 39 to 41 feels so much bigger than the jumps between any of the previous line lengths. By looking at where the rope's maximum swing lands compared to the boat it becomes pretty clear: You have to get WAY higher on the boat to get around buoys at 41. The amount the rope has to swing from line length to line length looks fairly linear through 39, then it makes a HUGE jump to 41.

 

The amount of energy it takes to get this much higher on the boat also feels like a LOT, as I'm pulling much harder behind the boat to feel like I can make ANY space at 41.

 

b6u9anahctov.jpg

 

Anyway I thought some people might find this interesting. Really impressive not just that Caldwell and others can run 41, but that they can do it with any sort of consistency. It becomes a game of power and control at a level much higher and more precise than most people will ever understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member

When you look at the actual lengths (metric -- @Horton feel free to hide), you see that every shortening amount is less that the previous shortening amount from 23m all the way to 10.75m. But THEN the shortening amount to the next length is the same (50cm). So right from the get-go the step from -39 to -41 is too big.

 

But then it gets worse. The step from 10.25 to 9.75 is AGAIN the same. Surely this means that the gap between -41 and -43 is ludicrous.

 

Given the potential disruption to the record books, it seems "too late" to fix 10.25/-41. But since nobody has ever run -43, I truly feel now is the time to change that gap to something in the range of 25-40cm. Having it be exactly 10m is oddly satsifying, but also totally irrelevant to the geometry, so I'd probably pick a 35cm gap and a 9.9m line.

 

OR ... fix the problem for real and make the course wider! @drew :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
What I find interesting for those at the longer line lengths looking at this is the angle of the skier at the buoy. It's virtually unchanged the whole way up to 41 off. To me this proves that the work in the slalom course is not done at the buoy but before and after the buoy. That big spray that attracts people to the sport is simply a by-product of the work that's been done to get the skier to the point where they need to change their direction. As for me, the jump from 28 to 32 is enough to keep me busy for a while!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@GaryJanzig yes good point. I think we’ve all seen the look of befuddlement in someone’s eyes the first time you try and explain to them that you are a competitive water skier.

 

@Than_Bogan I’m on board, let’s lobby for the 10m line length!

 

@Justin_C you are absolutely right. I approach the turns exactly the same way regardless of line length. It’s the work you do between the turns that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I am rather new to the sport and was always so confused why guys weren’t crushing 41 every time, because they all make 39 basically look easy. Recently watched an attempt at 36/41 from in the boat. It flat out looks 100% impossible. I was blown away in the difference from 39 to 41. Truly unbelievable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@AdamCord Was the larger dimension on the side of the boat for 39 verses 41 consistent for all your passes? If you had a lot of extra speed at the buoy at 41 and skied down course further would that not be the reason for the larger offset? Are these results similar with the other Adam or some of the 36 mph guys? Love this kind of analysis. Thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@Than_Bogan , @Wish I guess in his defense, water isn’t his thing. He didn’t grow up on the water like I did. He isn’t comfortable being in a boat or swimming. And No , he can’t drive a boat. Wouldn’t even put my brothers prostar in gear to get us away from shore. He thinks i ski way too much. But I love it so. I will just keep skiing. It makes me happy and that is what counts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@buoyboy1 great question. I purposefully chose to use 1 ball from each pass for this comparison so that my early/late-ness in the course isn’t a factor in the comparison. Not sure about other skiers but this offset seems pretty consistent in my own skiing, maybe that’s part of why I’m not out there crushing 41 up and down the lake like Caldwell :#
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Wait,... What? @Than_Bogan you want to shorten 10.25 to 10m?

And make the course wider?

 

Did you have a hard fall lately and go boom boom? ?

 

What I take from this post is that speed and getting high on the boat is paramount and my current challenge at getting consistent at 35 off.

 

The span and technique differences between 41 and 43 are akin to me worrying about which new Pratt and Whitney engine I should put in my Global Express.

 

But I truly take your point Adam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Industry Professional

Heres a composite of my skiing. You would find the same thing going on with any high level skier. Its just part of the game.

 

The secret behind short-line is not necessarily about generating more speed. But carrying your connection further around the pylon before allowing your mass to swing away from the handle.

 

For example, I don't need to go faster through the gate to run a clean 35 versus a scrappy 35. Usually my 35s are better when I cross CL moving slower, but can keep my upper body connected to the rope further around the pylon (radially). A slower gate and longer connection will make my speed at the buoy slower making the timing with the boat at the finish of turn much better.

 

As the rope shortens you will be moving faster though the gate and back of the boat, but its not necessarily the objective. The objective/ focus is on connection as we travel around the pylon. A long connection (after CL is made easier by optimizing the relationship between the handle path and the skis trajectory. To get the handle path and ski path to match more closely, we need to set the timing with the boat prior to entering the slalom course and control our path through CL so that we can productively be pulled into the swing after crossing CL.

 

ssditbs6vfw7.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
43 is insane. You’re practically slapping the driver in the back with the rope. Truly mind bending. That’s gotta be a weird peripheral visual for the driver to see a skier straight out and next to his head. Like a jumper passing the driver in the air.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Industry Professional

Whats cool to see in these photos is how much quicker the skier needs to get to the ball as the rope gets shorter.

 

This concept is kind of hard to think about...but these pictures show it happening.

 

Proof that short-line is not about getting to buoy width faster, its about getting to the ball faster.

 

How to accomplish that is the ultimate challenge!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
Cord sets Pacific Northwest MM record with 3 at 41 on the c75 Insanity. Video was from a good distance but looked to me like 4 ball may have been an option. Either way that’s crazy good skiing and seems like a full 41 may be in the cards for Adam. Congrats !!!! ??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Industry Professional

@keithh2oskier This spring I was rarely missing it on several different skis and several fin setups for nearly 2-3 months. Thats how you know a ski is GOOD.....and your driver is even better! I had purposely stopped posting video as it didn't look hard anymore, and I already had enough people trying to call bullshit as it was. Trying to figure out 43 is the new challenge but its hard. Have only been outside of 3 ball once. However its rare I'll even cut the rope. It can be brutal on the body, and I'm more focused on building confidence and learning the 41 pass...so I tend to spend more time there.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@coach3 assuming I've done everything I want to do on the way into CL, I'm attempting to get the ski pointed down the lake as early as possible and get into a position where the handle can't get peeled off my body through the whitewash. Easier said than done, especially at 41 since it's hard to build enough speed before CL, so the ski tends to still be loaded at CL, and also since the loads can get so high at the 2nd whitewash.

 

I do try and pull/keep my arms in, but that isn't even remotely possible if the ski is still pointed out when I get to the transition. The other key is letting the boat "open me up" off the 2nd wake, which means my hips/shoulders are rolling in toward the boat on the way out. That pulls me up over the ski and gets the ski to yaw a lot before I even release the handle. If I don't let that happen I'll run parallel to the boat and ski into a pile of slack on the back side of the turn.

 

This move is hard to see in pros if you don't know what you are looking for, but pay attention to how early you see the spray coming off their ski in the preturn. Spray is a sign that the ski is already starting to rotate into the turn. If you're not seeing much spray off your ski until after you release the handle, then you got separated and you let the ski go to the bank way too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...