Jump to content

jcamp

Baller
  • Posts

    1,057
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by jcamp

  1. 3 hours ago, KRoundy said:

    While we are all rightly concerned about our sport, I wonder if this issue is less about water skiing and more about the supply and demand of boats in general right now. Remember during the pandemic when everyone wanted RVs of ANY type? Now we have too many boats, campers, ATVs, etc sitting on dealer lots with no buyers. The manufactures of all RV equipment are struggling with demand right now. Dealer lots are FULL of brand new, 2023 build, equipment that nobody wants when interest rates are sky-high. I wonder what is going to fall out on the other side of this cycle for the entire RV industry?

    A good friend of mine is the global president of a major sporting goods (non-watersports) brand that everyone on this forum would recognize. The years of 2020-2021-ish were the best years they've had in decades. Now they are trying to figure out if/how they can survive. 

  2. 11 hours ago, Jody_Seal said:

    the realization that procurement of the resources to manufacture electric vehicles is far nastier to the environment then that of fossil fuel development. 

    Not true when considering the life of the vehicle and factoring in total emissions, at according to the EPA

    Myth #2: Electric vehicles are worse for the climate than gasoline cars because of battery manufacturing.

    • FACT: The greenhouse gas emissions associated with an electric vehicle over its lifetime are typically lower than those from an average gasoline-powered vehicle, even when accounting for manufacturing.

      Some studies have shown that making a typical EV can create more carbon pollution than making a gasoline car. This is because of the additional energy required to manufacture an EV’s battery. Still, over the lifetime of the vehicle, total GHG emissions associated with manufacturing, charging, and driving an EV are typically lower than the total GHGs associated with a gasoline car. That’s because EVs have zero tailpipe emissions and are typically responsible for significantly fewer GHGs during operation (see Myth 1 above).

      For example, researchers at Argonne National Laboratory estimated emissions for both a gasoline car and an EV with a 300-mile electric range. In their estimates, while GHG emissions from EV manufacturing and end-of-life are higher (shown in orange below), total GHGs for the EV are still lower than those for the gasoline car.

    Bar charts showing lifecycle GHGs for an electric vehicle and a gas car

    • Like 1
  3. I am a proud MasterCraft owner, but I would expect a much more sophisticated effort from both MasterCraft and NASBLA. If it's federal legislation you wouldn't contact your state legislators, and if it's state legislation it makes no sense for people in 49 other states to contact their state reps.  

    And then there is the fact that MasterCraft is asking slalom skiers in many states to give up 50' (my course is permitted in a state with a 150' limit) in order to protect the cash cow surf boats. 

    • Like 4
  4. I still blame Greek mismanagement for water skiing not being in the Olympics. If you'll recall, Athens picked water skiing for the 2004 games. At the time, hosts got to pick one or two spots to add to the program. In any other situation this would heave been a lock for water skiing, but Athens fell way behind on preparations, to the point that the IOC considered taking the games back to Sydney, the 2000 hosts. Instead, the IOC said "you've got enough on your hands" and didn't honor Athens' request to add water skiing.

    As much as the Olympic effort is crapped on on this forum, ad nauseum and I think unfairly, it actually worked. If the sport would have been picked by any other host we'd probably still be in the Olympics today. It's a shame Atlanta didn't pick water skiing as Georgia native Regina Jaquess would probably have a few golds right now if they had.  

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
  5. In college sports (football especially), collectives have become a massive (if not THE) factor in recruiting. They raise $ specifically to support a college team, and sometimes even certain position groups. For example, the Pancake Factory Collective pays every University of Texas lineman $50,000 a year.  

    What if the water ski community developed something similar for overall skiers? $20,000 spread amongst the top three men and women at the top of the overall rankings list at the end of each year would be a good incentive and help support all the training that goes into being a 3-eventer.  

  6. The Big Dawg Tour definitely had its shortcomings and was rightly criticized by some during it's run, but it undoubtedly brought interest and competition to 35+ skiing that I think the sport has been missing the last couple years. I'm not super familiar with 55kWest and the people behind it so I can't say if they are the "tour" to do it, but I would like to see something along the lines of the Big Dawg Tour again.  

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...