MarkM

6 hours ago, The_MS said:

@Wish less Goodes = less 39s run 😎I

I believe Goodes ran 2 out of 3 39s for the 55k. 

Goodes also ran both 39s in the warm up. 
 

5 hours ago, The_MS said:

@Wish less Goodes = less 39s run 😎

44 minutes ago, Horton said:

Pictures????

 

This looks really cool.  But without a plate, doesn't it put extra strain on the skis binding inserts?

Saturday 10/15:

Sunday 10/16:

https://youtu.be/aSLUCYBIV3k

Internet is not great. Sorry for the trouble. Working now!

Fixed it

https://youtu.be/9p5yzXorjlM

Here is the link for Sunday 930am-ish

https://youtu.be/9p5yzXorjlM

Here is the link for Sunday 930-ish am Eastern.

https://youtu.be/9p5yzXorjlM

There should be a 3/4 buoy score as well.

Falling around the buoy vs getting back to the wakes and popping the handle shouldn’t be the same score.

@keithh2oskier

Negative. The heel is cut too low and your heel is not secure.

Rear bindings either come in the format of a boot or a flip-flop/sandal.

For me, a boot is too restrictive and a flip-flop/sandal is too loose and unsupportive.

I realize there are choices like a radar Hybrid, Reflex rear, etc. but the heels are so cut down that your heel slips out.

Why not make a rear binding in the format of a running shoe? This would support your foot/heel and free up your ankle.

@MISkier

Yes, I clearly understand the concept. But it is far from mathematical. It's nonsense.

6@35 34mph is not equal to 6@32 36mph. We have satellites in space controlling our boat speeds within 1000th of a second and devices tracking our boat paths within a gnats ass.

All of a sudden 2mph=exactly 6 buoys at every line length. *Science!

@swbca

It’s ridiculous they are scored the same