Jump to content

MALIBU RESPONSE 2003-2006


bananaron
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
Looking at a 2003 Response LXI .Any changes between this yr and a 2004 thru 06.Are the wakes pretty much the same.I ski a friends 2005 LXI and the wake is great.Also what is the 383 hammerhead engine like.Any info and comments would be appreciated.THX............Ron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Wakes will be the same from '03 to '06. Differences are the seat height is a bit higher in the '04-'06. The '03 felt like you were sitting a bit low for my tastes. They changed the dash/gauges and the font for the decal under the dash for '06. There were other minor changes as well, such as the factory stereo options over the years (JBL vs Sony, etc).

 

Hammerhead is hit and miss. If it's high hours and hasn't been problematic, it's probably fine. They're cammed up beasts that like to rev, but also have a tendency to burn oil if they were babied when new. There was a replacement dipstick for these and an updated oil capacity spec that helped address most people's issues. Review the history of the engine if it's available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
@bananaron : 2003-2006 LXi is commonly referred to as Gen 1, the Gen 2 is 2007 on. Hull is same for all Gen 1 LXi's. I suggest going to Malibu Crew website to review comments on Hammerhead. Also, the Gen 1 LXi is the preferred barefoot machine, the Gen 2 model is not well received.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Bill22 good question. Throttle by wire first appeared with the dash refresh in '06. It was the first year Malibu offered their own cruise, which leveraged TBW. Forgot about that. They didn't get shift-by-wire until '07 or '08, which is where my above confusion came from. Not sure if you can get the new ECM to work on an '06 or not. Might be limited to ZO.

 

BTW, the '06 and '07 TBW systems were not the most popular with people used to instant cable response. There was a bit of a lag which some didn't care for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
I had read somewhere a while ago that there was no ECM calibration for the 2006, so no ZO. Don't know if that changed or not. It seemed like the TBW was OK, but no support for the ECM to work with that year.

The worst slalom equipment I own is between my ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@UWSkier I don't know the answer to your question. Skied behind my 07 Malibu LXi today starting it's 4th season with ZO. Seem to recall that the 06 and earlier couldn't accept the new ECM that is needed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

What about the Z-Box option if you have an older boat? The guy I bought my 2003 LXi from was using it, and said it skied very similar to ZO.

 

The 2003 would either have the Monsoon 335 or the Hammerhead 375. The 375 obviously has more hp, but doesn't have any more torque. Malibu literature says the 335 has over 380 lb ft and the 375 has 387. I'm assuming the 2004 340 and 380 HH would be similar.

 

I would imagine the difference between the 2005 340 and 383 HH would be more noticeable though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Yeah, much bigger difference between the Monsoon and Hammerhead once the latter became a stroker motor.

 

I've done a lot of reading on Z-Box myself. Many say that when paired with the latest SG version, it's pretty close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I believe the issue in 06 ZO retrofits is the introduction of catalytic converters in 07. The ECM required to operate ZO doesn’t work with Indmar motors pre-cats. I learned this researching ZO for an 05 Mastercraft but suspect it is the same for Malibu. 06 was the first “drive by wire” in Malibu. Mastercraft launched it in 05 and CC and Malibu launched it in 06.

 

If ZO is important, I’d buy one that already has it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Still love my 2004 LXI 340. 1000 hours. Lucky Lowe’s old boat. PP ok to 28 off at 34. Never tried shorter rope than that. Doesn’t use a drop of oil but I had to replace the entire tranny a few years ago.... I should probably have changed the fluid earlier! (And the clutch plate). Next on the list is storage locker cover skins.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...