Jump to content

lpskier

Baller_
  • Posts

    4,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by lpskier

  1. There was a $200,000 price difference between the gas and electric models, I believe. ($150,000 vs $350,000)
     

    Ingenity, Correct Craft’s all electric brand, makes an extremely cool 27’ electric Hackercraft triple cockpit runabout. It gets 1.7 hours of run time per charge. That doesn’t sound like much, but assuming a Natigue would get about the same run time per charge and if you don’t “idle” the boat when the skier drops, (or whatever electric boats do), you can get a six pass set in eight minutes on the motor. That would be a little over 12 sets a charge, and that doesn’t sound bad. But for me that extra 200 grand is a deal breaker. 

  2. @Horton Maybe, but it only takes one to cause a big rule compliance problem if you aren’t prepared. I get to CJ a bunch of record tournaments every year, and one of my primary goals is to avoid unforced errors. For what it is worth, my other big goal is to make sure every skier has a positive experience (within the rules). 

    • Like 2
  3. One thing we will have to do as tournament organizers is update our handle measuring devices to comply with the IWWF rule for measuring handles, which provides that the handle end of the device is no more than 2 cm wide ( and should fit through the slot in the center of the T Handle “yoke” to measure the length of the handle section). The 3.5” wide end piece allowed under AWSA rules, often a piece of 2x4, won’t work with this handle.


    And while a “normal” handle has a +2.5 cm tolerance, the T handle may not measure longer than 150 cm. 

    • Like 1
  4. @skialex Actually, Wade Cox ran 39  (1@41) on June 19, 1991 in Miami, FL, breaking Bob LaPoint’s record of 5 at 39 that had held since 1984. Jeff tied the record on July 1 of the same year in Madison, Ga. Jeff, of course, was the first to run 41, both at 36 and 34. 
     

    These are, of course, record tournament scores. If you know of a Class C score of 6@39 or better prior to 6/19/91, I stand corrected. In my book, that would still be a first and the score would count (no ranking list back then, though), but it would not be a record and would not go in the books as such. 

  5. I was talking to Rossi some time ago and mentioned it was too bad there wasn’t a good book on water skiing, and he said “There is. Warren Witherall wrote it.” I said I knew Warren wrote “How the Racers Ski” about snow ski racing but I didn’t know he’d written a book about water skiing. Rossi said “That’s the book. Just add ‘water’ every time you read ‘ski’ or ‘skier’ and you’ve got it.” 

    • Like 2
  6. @BKistler It was a ski pond until just a few years ago when the Goodhue’s sold it. Whether the new owners ski on it or not, I don’t know, but there are no more tournaments there, or anywhere In Massachusetts for that matter. In fact, I think there are only four tournament sites left in all of New England: one in CT, two in NH (one private, one on public water) and one in VT (on public water). Two of those sites have jumps. 

  7. You can barely walk due to a lifetime of accumulated injuries, but you can still count on your -35. Or in the case of my friend LH, Boy Scouts help you cross the street but you’re still good for age group national records and gold medals at Senior Worlds. 
     

    And the most important option in your car is the seat heater, even if you live in Florida. 

    • Like 2
  8. I suffered from golfer’s elbow for years. Since going to a larger diameter radius handle and the Masterline Optimized 2 rope, I have had no elbow issues whatsoever. However, a couple weeks before Regionals I switch to the regular black ML rope and ski it through Nationals, and I can hear my elbows just starting to talk to me by the time I switch ropes again after Nationals. Once I switch back, my elbows almost immediately recover. 

    • Like 1
  9. I don’t disagree that an RTP is preferable in terms of performance. However, from the injury avoidance perspective, I think a double boot of some sort is likely safer than a front boot and kicker. With a kicker you can have a fall where your back foot comes out and your front foot stays in, leaving your front ankle exposed to serious injury. Perhaps the best option is a kicker with a releasable front boot, such as a Reflex. 
     

    I will also say that changing back to a kicker after years in a double boot (hard shells in my case) is very challenging. 
     

    Below is the 2023 aftermath of a 1973 fall where my back foot came out and my front foot stayed in. 

    IMG_8235.jpeg

    • Thanks 1
  10. I’m sure someone (maybe his wife) told Edison that his “light bulb” thingy would never work. 
     

    I’m fortunate to ski with a bunch of different skiers who, from time to time, experiment with all sorts of stuff. Granted, many are involved in ski design, but they aren’t shy about trying new ideas. Extra layers of carbon, bondo, changing bevels, different fin shapes, cutting down, softening or stiffening hard shells, etc.  I watched KLP and Parrish come up with the idea of attaching the Radar boot to a Reflex plate and then stiffening the boot with some carbon  The point is, thank God there are people out there thinking and tinkering. The only difference between them and @swbca is the supply if skis or bindings to work on and a market for whatever ideas work out. So don’t be such Negative Nellies. I for one am interested in hearing @swbca’s report and maybe seeing some photos. That information may, at some time, for some one of us, be helpful. 

     

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...