Jump to content

9800 review


Recommended Posts

I have ridden a 9800 for 5 sets now and so far I am not happy.

I started up at stock all the way around with Fins and Bindings. The first set I could not run 28 due to breaking at the waist after hookup. 6.90 DFT 6.872 Length and 2.449 depth. Boots at 29.3/4 from back.

I checked it all out and took out some tip. It felt better on next set, the breaking at the waist feeling started to go away, but I was working like a dog to get the ski to move fast. I took some angle off my wing ( from 9 to 8) and also used a HO wing insted of the Goode wing. 

So on the next set it skis pretty well into 35, but then I keep droping into the ball on my turn right before I grab (on side, 2-4-6)  the handle and hook up. This is the same feeling I always got from my 9500 and was the reason I went to the Monza. I ran about 6 passes and when I was done I was exausted from work.

I ran this ski at the ski test and loved it, but it was on day 2 and I had been off my Monza for a few day by then. I also was on the 9700 for 2 sets before the 9800. But I never had to work a ski this hard to get it going from ball to ball. I wonder if I got a dud.

Speaking to a few heavy hitters that ride the 9800, I may try to bring my bindings back 1 hole and add some depth and go a bit shorter. That will be my plan for tonight. If this thing is not getting comfortable by mid week, I will have a brand new 9800 with HO holes that will make someone happy. 66.5 186 amp 9800.

The one thing that got me to try a 9800 from my Monza was my off side 1 ball gates are getting the best of me. The 9800 is giving me a much better 1 ball, but I dont know why. I dont have to think about angle as it just does it on its own. I have not had slack issues comming out of 1 ball, even at 38. Now If I could just inject some nitro into this thing.

Any ideas on how to make this thing speed up.        

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 From my limited experience with the 9800, I have found that taking away fin area speeds up the ski.

 Dave miller is running 6.845 2.449 .72  7 degree wing.  Those numbers don't work for me but I bet he is heavy for his ski size and I'm light for mine.

 Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I moved my front boot back to 29.5 and moved the back the same. I took out some tip and had it at 6.850 with 2.449 and .690 DFT. I put the Goode wing on and back at 9.

This is the best the ski has felt so far. I was not working as hard to get the speed needed to run my 28/32/35 passes. I ran a bunch of 35s, but not as pretty as I do on my Monza. It is giving me a good one ball hook up, but I dont think it is good enough to make a change. I paln to ride it again for a few sets tommorrow, and will paly around with wing angle and maybe add some depth. If I dont see 38 comming any easier, I will have a 9800 FS for someone.     

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried it at 8 the day before, but not with the new binding set up. I will move back to 8 tommorrow and give it a try. Scott J runs a smaller wing at 8.  

JD,

What have you tried that I have not? I am trying to find the sweetness of the 9800 that I rode at the test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Mark - I would wait and talk w/ Chad.  He's got the ski figured out.  He's bringing me a 66.5 to ride this weekend.  My 9500 took a hit on Dawg's platform last weekend and took a 1" slice down the bevel. 

I've never ridden a smaller Goode but he says the stiffness will more than make up for the size.  We'll see.  At 195lbs, that seems a bit small.  But I've ridden other brands of 67" and felt fine so it may work.

When I rode Mike's 67" earlier this summer, I found less tip and stock depth worked better.   The ski didn't come to life out of the ball until I was around 6.850 or shorter (jaws).   I also took the old black fin off of my 9500 and put it on the 9800.  I liked it better.  So, if you have an old stock Goode fin laying around, stick it in there and give it a go. 

 jhd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks JD.

I called CS yesterday and he says less tip and bindings back. I guess november was a ways back, but when I rode that 9800 it was great. But I was on all those skis and maybe my monza was already out of my memory muscels by then. I can run the 9800 deep into my ball count, but its not nearly as easy as doing it on my Monza.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I set the depth at 2.449, lenght at 6.860 and .690 DFT.

Bindings are at 29.5 from tail.

I took 2 more sets last night and finally ran into 39 a few times. My 35s are not a problem, but I still am having issues with my 1,3,5 side at 38. It is technique on my part. I need to open up more and ski back to the handle.

The ski is becoming more comfortable to ride and the breaking after hook up is gone. I do not have any more confidance riding this ski then my Monza. I will ride into the weekend and if ball count is not going up, I will have a 9800 for someone to buy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am using the goode wing, but have tried both. Maybe I will go back to my HO wing tonight.

Dawg, I think you may be on to somthing. It does feel pretty good at 28/32, maybe I just need to start skiing.

But I need a ball count soon, or I go back to my Monza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

 

One more question.  Is the wing change a straight swap or do I have to add length or anything to compensate for losing the anchor?

On a side note, I did a side by side video comparison between the Goode and my Sixam.  I have better body position on the Goode but I do notice that the Sixam is faster out of the ball, the Goode feels more stable though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 9800 is officaly for sale. I could not get comfortable on this ski. I put 12 sets into it and it is getting me through 38, but I feel exausted when I am done. I realized that I was trying to tune the Goode to feel like my Monza. How stupid is that? I just tried to ride it for the last 2 sets and it would take me down at the ball all the time. The Goode will not carry speed like my Monza. I tried the wing at 8, big wings, small wings, 9, more depth, less depth, more tip and less tip. The ski did not change. I did notice that when I pulled the tip to 6.850, the ski would sing when you would speed up. With the stock 6.872, it would not make any noise.

Anyone need a 9800 with HO holes?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...