Jump to content
Love what we do here at BallOfSpray? Help us keep it going! Your support means the world—click the link below to donate.
 

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=Y3CSX74PYYFUE

 

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
Posted

@kelvin I have been wondering about that also. I think the 6.0L (409) is the standard motor now that the 5.7 has been discontinued. The 5.3 is the first upgrade and the 6.2 is the most expensive. I think the 5.3 has higher torque than the 6.0. Our last one we got the 5.3. It is a huge improvement for jump (180+/-) over the 5.7 I was not able to get the homeowners to pay the addtional cost for the 6.2

One other thing to think about, is that I dont think the 6L direct inject.

 

  • Baller
Posted

@Kelvin - pretty sure the 450 is a PCM exclusive with a modified camshaft (compared to stock 409 longblock) and an ECM tune to harvest the extra HP (and presumably torque).

 

Both iron block/aluminum heads, closed cooling, weight, same compression, should be same octane req, etc.

 

of course the 409 itself is plenty torquey for slalom and a great slalom pull in the 200; the 450 slalom pull some will prefer, some won't. However if the jumpers have feedback regarding the 450's comparatively greater benefit, then no reason not (other than cost) to go with the 450.

 

@Jody_Seal would have better input.

  • Baller_
Posted
Go with a stock 409 hp repower. Not worth the extra $$$$ in bang for the buck. Have had both power options in the past and unless you are a +220' foot jumper the 409 is pleanty.
  • Baller
Posted
Actually, what @Jody_Seal said. One of my ski buds has the 6.0 and swear it seems like just thumb pressure on the throttle gets skiers out of the water, plenty of power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...