For what it's worth I lurk and enjoy this site very much. I don't post much, but wanted to respond. Don't get me wrong I'm not knocking either system they both are good at what they do, but there are differences, can that be a good thing? I do prefer SG and am in a position to ski behind ZO only during tournaments. I wish ZO would admin that there are differences then maybe this debate would stop who knows. I use C1 behind SN200 and C3 behind Mastercraft still different than SG but close so it works and as long as I can ski my average that's ok with me. Boody: I understand what you are saying though the experience that I have had is completely the opposite.           7: Ridiculous comments like "Zero Off is killing our sport" is not helping to get this sport to grow. Maybe not but the way this ZO thing is going          it's not helping our sport either. Just my oppionon How about the differences between PP and Accuski back in the day? I guess it all relative the better we get as skiers the better we can adapt to the changes in speed controls, wind, water, temps, location, stress.Â