Jump to content

skibrain

Baller
  • Posts

    379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by skibrain

  1. I have not tried their bent handle.
     

    I bought one of their 13” straight 1.092” as soon as they came out with handles.  Within the first three weeks the handle rubber was wearing fast and feathered badly. 
     

    I contacted s-lines and described the situation (I had ordered it from them online). They asked for some photos, confirmed the handle defective and PROMPTLY sent a replacement that has been great. 👍 

    • Like 1
  2. @Gale K  the manual wedge is removed… no need to make waves.  Through -35 and -38 no noticeable difference in spray or wake shape. IDK, maybe 1-2 mph slower but can’t recall for sure and we never did a back to back GPS. Boat still shows 42 WOT. 
     

    Only significant difference: In a tight button-hole turn at end of the lake, there is shin-high spray off the FAE exhaust skeg as it is pushed more sideways through the water.  But that is easy to avoid by staying about 3’ inside or outside of that spot.  Surprised the first time we spun, but not an issue really. 

    IMG_6795.jpeg

    the exhaust is mounted via a square tube supported by the swim platform brackets. I don’t have dimension FAE sticks out behind transom, but you wouldn’t want this if you have to remove swim platform to close garage door.   I don’t know if that is the same mount system as when we did the install 10 years ago. 

  3. The stuff I’ve read says this is for their surf boats exclusively. X24 x26 xSTAR. The kids can never have too much power when they’re commanding 5 tons of tug churning along off-plane at 12 mph….

  4. @BlueSki agree. Getting started requires less optimal conditions, but short-line slalom skiing doesn’t work without good water. We do 95% of our skiing on public water between 5:30 and 7:30 am. I’ll happily miss sleep and endure cold.  
     

    We have A LOT of water in MN, but I’d drop the sport of slalom skiing in a minute if I couldn’t find it smooth. 

    • Like 4
  5. When I was 13, my dad picked up a pair of Nash brand wood combos for $15.  Said “TUNNEL CONCAVE” right on the bottom, calling attention to the shallow recess milled out of the center. As my brother and I were both slaloming, older bro got the ski with rear toe.  My dad had the brilliant idea of “cutting down” the second ski from full 68” Using a jig saw to remove 3” off the tip and 3” off the tail. Looked about right to pops.  He added a rear toe and I picked out a 3” deep metal fin. Barely any curve on tip. No rocker. No bevels. 
     

    I tried my best on that thing for the rest of the summer but it was dangerously bad.  

    • Like 3
  6. The slalom wake would be larger (worse)  behind the Sea Ray. The Sea Ray likely weighs twice that of your Bayliner. More passengers onboard (which I suspect is the reason to buy a larger boat) will add to a problem of a wake shape and firmness that is undesirable for skiing back and forth through that wake quickly. 
     

    Ski boats are designed with, among other things, a flat or very minimal dead rise (v-shape) to the hull.  

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...