Very interesting thread. I'm a MM rated skier who consistantly runs 38 off but I don't seem to get too far at 39 in tournaments. I feel like this "senior division" or whatever you call it is targeted at skiers like me. Personally, I don't like it. I went to the Big Dawg in Abbotsford last year for fun and the hope of qualifying for the finals. After I skied bad in the first round, I thought I was out of it and called my wife to tell her I wasn't going to go to Florida for nats or the finals. However, most of the other skiers didn't do too well in the rough conditions either. I ended up skiing pretty well in the second round and made the finals. I then had to then call my wife back and tell her I was going to spend the money to go to Florida. I went to Florida and had a good time.
My point is this, if I didn't qualify for the Big Dawg finals last year, but there was some other division targeted at 2 or 3 at 39 skiers like me to ski in that I did qualify for, I wouldn't have gone to Florida. I think my menatality is a bit like Hortons on the age divisions at nationals. I don't want to be "best of the rest". I want to work hard and see how I stack up against the best skiers. Further, I wouldn't want to ski in a different division or event than some of my friends like Kevin Bishop, Matt Brown, and Greg Badal. Even though I'd probably lose, I'd rather ski against them.
Perhaps a better solution would be to just expand the head to head finals to 32 skiers and hold it over 2 days. The best skiers would probably get an easy ride through the first bracket and skiers like me might get a chance to go head to head against Mapple, Lapoint, or some other ex pro. That would be cool!