@skispray, you're right, my mistake. The study I referenced was the one that was referenced in the movie which was done in Inda in '65. Campbell then reproduced that study in different iterations, and the one you quoted above (done in '92) contradicts what was in the Indian study (with respect to the lifespan of the rats). The LP rats in the Indian study appear to have been killed by their susceptibility to aflatoxin and when Campbell reproduced the study in '92 using a different rat model the LP rats didn't die.
I think it would be an egregious error to say that Campbell was a fraud, far from it, from what I've read, his work with the rat/cancer studies has produced a lot of quality data. What I said initially, was that the casein study as it was presented in the movie, by Campbell, was misleading. The inferred conclusion that consuming milk products, (and they even went so far as to extend this out to animal protein) promoted cancer was deeply flawed.
Again this is misleading.
There is a very good breakdown of that research here;
https://www.westonaprice.org/the-curious-case-of-campbells-rats-does-protein-deficiency-prevent-cancer/
Also interesting, casein cancer studies have been done in monkeys with more reasonable doses of aflotixin and these do not support the conclusions in the movie, they more or less contradict it. http://repository.ias.ac.in/24650/1/314.pdf
All that being said, I wasn't trying to promote or disparage one type of diet over another,and I certainly wasn't intending on a full swing debate on what kind of scientist Campbell is. I was simply trying to point out that I felt the movie was agenda based and misleading. The only example I could come up with off the top of my head was the casein study. Now, being forced to do a bunch of reading to support my claim, I've found all kinds of examples that others (Denise Minger for one) have dug up regarding the movie, not the least of which how Campbell's conclusions in the China study are not supported by his own data. Intentional or not, from what I've read, Campbell has included a lot of confirmation bias in his research, and I'll say it once more, the movie is agenda based and misleading.