Boody Posted September 5, 2012 Share Posted September 5, 2012 I am looking for either a Nano or 9960, but a traditional size, 65.75, 165 amp and right foot forward. Feel free to email me. mkbudreau@charter.net THanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Than_Bogan Posted September 5, 2012 Baller Share Posted September 5, 2012 Oh man. I have one of those (9900sl), but I can't give it away because it's the first (and so far only) ski I ran -38 in a tournament on. It's going on the wall as soon as I get around to it. Kinda curious why you're looking for one, but understand if you're not sharing that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boody Posted September 5, 2012 Author Share Posted September 5, 2012 Darnit Than! Yea, I like my mid Nano, pretty stable ski. I ski very smooth on it. But after riding a Nano One and a Traditional Nano, I want to go back to the traditional shape. The Nano One did not work for me, just too much work, loved the turns tho. The traditional width may not be as stable, but it has a more "race car" feel. I think it may be able to take me further. I was on the 9900 sl just like like you but sold it after buying my mid. I would like it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Than_Bogan Posted September 5, 2012 Baller Share Posted September 5, 2012 I gotta agree on the racecar feel. The only thing that I don't like about the Nano One is that I don't FEEL like I'm going as fast, accelerating as hard, etc. I'm running more buoys, and (unlike you) I'm working even less for it, but the extreme stability and semi-automatic turning almost seem to take some of the thrill away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller MAD11 Posted September 5, 2012 Baller Share Posted September 5, 2012 @boody I have an almost brand new 66.5 standard nano RFF if you know anyone interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.