Jump to content

Need some tips on the perfect shaped lake...


epyscs
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guys, just trying to mock something out on a site that might be coming up for sale near here. What I need is to get a Google Earth view of a really well shaped 3-event ski site. I.e. something that is tight on both length and width, but works perfectly for tournament skiing.

 

We potentially have length and width restrictions so this must to be fairly well 'contoured' (sp?) to the courses.

 

I am thinking a site such as Hazelwoods in the UK, however that doesnt work well as due to trees I an finding it hard to get the true size and shape of the lake to overlay onto the potential site.

 

Any other thoughts?

 

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

For slalom, about 200 feet width is a minimum, with the course running down the center.

If you are going to have jumping, you should have about 300 feet of width in the

jumping area. IWWF recommends 40 meters clearance ramp to shore. I have witnessed

some close ones in my time, whether losing it on the countercut or nearly landing "dry"

on shore on a very late pass/fall at the ramp.

 

For length, I have seen sites down around 1400 feet, with overlapping courses, but

more like 1800 or 1900 feet is about a minimum. And, getting over 2,000 feet starts

to become sort of comfortable for skier and driver.

 

Turn islands: previous discussions have covered this, with the plus and minus factors.

 

Shoreline slope is also important, and 8 to 1 or flatter seems to be the recommendation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

Look at Tivoli Gardens in Gaines, MI or Lake Jepawhit in Gaines, MI (near the intersection of Baldwin and Seymour Rds). They are about a mile apart. Both very good 3 event lakes. Roughly 2200 feet in length each. You could probably scale down a little on the length of each. Jepawhit is narrower than Tivoli and only expands where needed at the jump.

 

Tivoli runs northeast to southwest. Jepawhit runs due north to due south. Direction is important. If you are running due east to due west, expect to ski into the sun during the prime low-wind hours of early morning and late evening. That can make things difficult to see.

 

Regarding slope, I had heard that nature seeks a 16 to 1 slope (don't recall where I heard that). So, that might be the target to minimize erosion and maximize wave dispersal. As Ed mentioned, the more flat and gradual, the better.

The worst slalom equipment I own is between my ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

No stinkin turn islands makes more options for a short site. My lakes at 1800' with no islands but a bit of dogleg are very comfortable.

 

AWSA once published a 15m or 50 foot clearance. That makes the minimum slalom width about 175'. Of course, to make this clearance work you could get away with a narrower lake and scallop the shoreline in the vicinity of the buoys (110' plus the 37' cutout at each buoy) . I did that at one of my lakes on one side and it is quite comfortable. But we like to trick on the wider side.

 

Narrow short lakes offer superior water conditions. There is less fetch for wind and any boat or skier rollers dissipate faster because they hit a shoreline faster.

 

The shoreline will erode to its natural slope depending on the soil type. My clay makes walls no matter what the starting slope. Anything flatter than about 8:1 is not noticeable on water and 5:1 will give reasonable water. My walls suck - I need to figure out something (pipes floating?).

 

Turn islands suck. And kill people (with the resultant liability issues). And make the lake much less comfortable for tricks and wakeboards.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I know it is not feasible or even probably wise, but when Utah Lake Course one is operational, it is the best lake in the Country. Doesn't matter how windy, it is always smooth. As for width, about 10 feet past the balls on each side you will end up in the reeds! But, if you don't mind hiking out on a bad otf, nothing beats it! This is @Scotchipman s wife Kelly. So, @epyscs, make your lake just like this one, and you will have the perfect shaped lake.....Oh, as a side note, you don't have to worry about the ratio when the deepest spot is at most 4 feet! :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Just throwing this out. Mine is 2150' long and a "straight in" lake. Were I to do it again I would put a turn island at the far end. I did not want islands for the hassle of upkeep, but now wish I had more time to get comfortable in the set up. Ski Ranch in Covington is 2150' long, but with turn islands on both ends. It seems like you have forever to set up...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...