Jump to content

Warp 14 Review


Horton
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

http://www.ballofspray.com/images/warp-2.JPG

In 2007, German brothers Matthias and Philipp Auer announced the Warp. The Auer brothers combined their love for waterskiing with their experience in aerospace and in motorsport engineering to create what may be the most groundbreaking ski of our time. Because of the ski’s high price, limited availability, minimal promotion, and obscure origins, it has remained on the fringe of the sport.

 

The shape of the Warp does not look radically different, but under close inspection, it is unique. Compared to most skis, the tail is slightly narrower, and the middle is slightly wider. The widest place on the ski is farther forward than most other skis. This is all accentuated by the fact that bindings are mounted farther back than other skis of the same size. You can read more about the shape here.

 

The Warp has the unusual combination of being extremely forgiving and extremely fast. If “fast” means that the ski gets wide and early without the skier using much physical strength or technical skill, then the Warp is one of the fastest skis on the market. Technically errors always lead to a lower score, but typical errors are less costly on the Warp than expected. Simply put, the Warp is easy to ride.

 

Off Side

For off side turns, the Warp will turn with weight over the skier’s back foot, but it will turn better and better as the skier adds weight to their front foot. This is not unusual among the current high end skis. What is noteworthy is that the skier can push forward harder and with less finesse without getting in trouble.

 

If the skier keeps their shoulders high off the water and presses forward, the Warp will maintain substantial speed and arc back to the center smoothly. If the skier allows their shoulders to lean in toward the center of the course too early, the ski will roll over and make a very sudden hard turn. Either way, the ski almost always generates more than enough angle at the off side turn.

 

On Side

On side turns are similar to the off side turn because the Warp does best with weight forward, but it is forgiving to imperfect weight distribution. On Side turns are basically foolproof.

http://www.ballofspray.com/images/warp-4.JPG

Ball to Wakes

One of the secrets to skiing consistently on the Warp is not using more strength than is necessary. If pushed, the ski may create more angle and load than can be effectively handled. A calm and relaxed skier, who works just hard enough to hold angle, will be wide and early to the next ball.

 

Wakes to Ball

The Warp becomes increasingly stable as the skier presses forward on the ski approaching the ball. The Warp consistently gets wide and early even if the skier makes moderate errors.

 

Performance Summary

More than any ski ridden to date, the secret to a big score on the Warp is to do less of everything. This ski wants the skier to take angle but load the rope only as much as is necessary. For turns on both sides, this ski works best if the skier presses their front foot forward but does not push the ski to turn. The more the skier stays tall and gives the ski less input, the better the ski works.

 

Quirks & Notes

The Warp is truly a unique boutique product. Unlike mass produced skis, the Warp has some idiosyncrasies. The ski does not have inserts so DualLock or some other adhesive system is needed to mount bindings on it. The fin box is not my favorite but not the worst I have ever used. There are reports of cosmetic issues as well as skis that get water inside of them. These quirks are easily dealt with and are completely overshadowed by the ski’s performance.

 

The design was licensed to another manufacturer between between 2010 and 2012, but now, the Auer brothers have taken the Warp back under their control.

 

The bulk of this review is based on a Warp with the following flex numbers 82 105 130 150 (156). I also had the opportunity to try a Warp with slightly softer flex. I found the softer ski to be not as forgiving, but when I was technically at my very best, the softer ski was even better. The softer ski requires more finesse at the off side turn but generates even more angle and speed. If I had to chose, I would take the stiffer of the two skis.

 

During the 7 weeks of the Warp review, I skied equal to my previous personal best a number of times on both skis and increased my personal best score by one ball on the softer ski.

http://www.ballofspray.com/images/warp-6.JPG

 

Settings as tested 28.5 / 6.8230 / 2.500 / 0.814 slot / 9 degrees

Get your own Warp

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@horton do you think the hollow design is a factor? I remember seeing a prototype and the concept was that they adjust the flex by changing the angle of the internal core stringers. When you got the second ski could you tell how they went about adjusting the flex?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporting Member
This review is very enlightening in one respect: I have been wondering why all the video and pictures look like you are way back on the ski but somehow not riding the tail. The shape and boot position you've explained seem to dictate that. It will be interesting to see if this is the start of a new trend or just a wacky outlier.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@disland I would speculate that the hollow design means the ski will maintain its flex for a lot longer than a traditional ski. I have not proof but here is anecdotal evidence.

 

How they adjust the flex? Beats me. Less carbon or carbon in a different place.

 

@Than_Bogan I think that if this design had been introduced by a big US ski company for a price in line with the rest of the skis it could have been very disruptive to the industry.

 

@mwetskier you know how you can have a Model T any color you want as long as it is black? You can have a Warp any size you want as long as it is 67.

 

Ski size is a wacky subject to begin with. Within reason I think the Warp is one size fits all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
@Skoot1123‌ do you really have to read between the lines. Sometimes my reviews require reading skills but I think this one is pretty clear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporting Member

@colo_skier is referring to a hilarious internet video (um, hilarious to software engineers anyhow) that is a send-up of a typical meeting with management and customers.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl1UKXCB7Gg

 

If you've "been there" this video is painfully funny. Doesn't have a lot to do with the Warp review, though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@colo_skier & @than_bogan Best video ever! At my last job I did significant business with a very large software company (built specialized servers primarily) and meetings with them last few years were just like this.

How many software engineers does it take to screw in a light bulb?

No can do, it's a hardware problem...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

You forgot "All right then, we will send you a summary of this meeting shortly (like we needed one...we were there). After a few weeks, we will send you our proposal and an invite to another meeting whereby we may discuss our findings which will further tell you what you already know because you just told us...but now it will be our expert opinion".

 

At this point we tell the nugget head consultants that we're done.

 

Glad you had a good run on the Warp, @Horton. As always nice review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
@gmut each reviews takes about 30 rides over 5 weeks. The Warp review went long because my wive had a baby in middle and because I did not want to get off it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...