Jump to content

Thinking about selling my MC Prostar 197


jercrane
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

I got a sweet deal on a beautiful 2009 Prostar 197 last spring. It is my first real ski boat I’ve personally owned. I had an absolute blast skiing behind it all summer. Loved every minute of it. Installed Zero off and man that was just a game changer. God I love this boat for skiing.

 

Here’s the rub. I didn’t consider one important aspect of my boating life when I pulled the trigger. We regularly have a need to have 5 adults and 4 kids in the boat. Not for skiing mind you but cruising and such. The PS 197 capacity is 7 and roughly 1000 lbs. This was an issue all summer. Constantly having to have people stay behind when we went out in a group. We bumped past the capacity a few times and it was near impossible to keep the bow from swamping if anyone was up there.

 

In addition to this the MC gets pretty beat up in the open water in our lake when we need to go out on rougher water. This is less of a problem than the capacity issue but it’s something.

 

I am now kicking around the idea of trying to find a 2010/11 SN 200 OB. The capacity is 9 and 1400 lbs on the SN 200 I believe. I’d be in much better shape I think at that point.

 

I also do a decent amount of tubing with the kids. God I hate tubing but I hate whining more so I always give in. I kind of feel like I am punishing my poor little PS 197 every time I take the kids tubing.

 

I’m not willing to move out of a true slalom/3 event boat so don’t even suggest it.

 

Here’s my questions.

 

Wake expectations on the switch to the SN 200? I read all the posts about the 28 off debatable hump. Sounds subjective.

 

Rough water handling? Better or worse than the PS 197?

 

How about with the dreaded tubing? Think the 200 can take more abuse?

 

Anything else I should consider before seriously pursuing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Moving to another comp ski boat isn't going to solve your problems. You can get marginally better rough water performance from something like a sunsetter or MC 205, but the difference is marginal at best and the seating is still terrible.

 

I'd be looking for a crossover - like my Malibu VTX. Lot of money on top of what you would get for your 197, but they are a much more useful boat for general use and still a good ski boat. Option 2 is to keep your 197 and buy a cheap I/O runabout for general usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Since no one (myself included) answered the questions at the bottom of your post here are my .02 cents.

 

The wake on the 200 is better than the 197. The 200 is what I would say most tournament skiers prefer to ski behind.

 

"rough water" is subjective. I ski on a private lake so my rough water compared to public lake rough water are much different, I don't have any experience with a 200 or 197 on that kind of rough water.

 

I don't think one or the other will take more "abuse" from tubing, you will feel bad doing that on either boat.

 

One thing I would add is, who drives for you? If its someone who doesn't do a lot of skiing/driving the 200 will make their lives much easier. The 197 doesn't drive bad, but the 200 is just on a rail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
if you are willing to go a little older my Sunsetter LXI handles rough water better than a lot of DD boats and the freeboard is high enough we don't get wet generally. I think the wake is very comparable to the 197 b/c I ski behind that too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I think as close to ideal is a Malibu Txi...higher freeboard won't dive in front end as easily. And it's 6" longer than the 200. Makes a difference in bow space. Or if you want to go older the 1999-2004 Sunsetter LXi skis great, has lots of freeboard and copious storage, but no Zero Off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Ilivetoski Thanks for the answers ... I knew I'd get them eventually. We don't have a super rough lake its just not private so occasionally I'm out in some chop 6-8" chop kind of thing, running to the ski hole. Squam lake in NH for the curious. I generally have pretty good drivers in my ski crew but I need to teach my wife how to drive one of these days so that does sound nice. It sounds like I'll have just as many issues with swamping the bow so thats a wash. Tubing abuse won't be any better either. Man I hate tubing.

 

Factors for selling the 197 and buying a 200 OB

+1 for better wake

+1 for driveability

+1 for capacity (even if it doesn't mean less swamping)

0 pts for improved rough water

-1/2 pts for bow swamping since it sounds like it might be slightly worse than the 197

-1 cost since after poking around and values I think I'll be out of pocket another $5k or so

 

So it seems like it's not a home run but if I could find a 2010/11 200 OB it might not be a terrible swap.

 

As for the pontoon suggestions. I mean that sounds great and all but not really an option as we have limited dockage space at the lakehouse. Also it's just one more boat to deal with (already have a small Whaler for the kids in addition to 197, and neighbor pays us to dock his boat). Although if I got the pontoon I could tell the kids thats the only choice for tubing. :D

Did I mention I hate tubing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

The SDSU 200 floods the bow in its own wake slightly more often than my MC 197. Usually driver error. Ashley's Malibu is a bit better but so are her drivers and it still will dip the bow in its own wake. None of the boats are good when overloaded. I haven't been in "real" rough water - don't want to go there in a dedicated ski boat.

 

If the placard is the problem, when those kids grow (and start bringing friends) you'll exceed any ski boat placard. Wakeboard boats that are big enough are really tough to slalom behind (I ripped out my bindings exploding on the wakeboard boat's wake in perfect position on my opening pass).

 

A couple loads to the ski area? First world problem.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Second boat for sure. Upgrade ski boat if you want to. But a pontoon is great of you also have groups of people who want to ski. We use two ski boats and one usually just ferries out a new set of skiers and brings wet ones back to the dock while the other is pulling.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

There's a "best" answer to this, and it's been mentioned before. The 2004 Malibu Sunsetter LXi. Doesn't give up anything to your 197 in the wake or tracking departments, can take 11 people, and won't dip the bow unless you're REALLY not paying attention. Problem is it'll be hard to find one. They're cherished.

 

Do you course ski or free ski mostly? Tournaments? If you're mostly a free skier, PP with Zbox will get you mostly back to your ZO feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Hard to have the best of both worlds. I've mentioned on another thread that I made the mistake of buying a OB200 for a public lake boat. Incredible boat, however, as others have mentioned the bow is very low and "swampable". I finally bought a used GS20 and love it. Moving the 200 out to the private ski lake and selling my 2007 196. I'm very lucky to have the resources to have more than one boat. If you want any feedback about the current crop of smaller boats like the GS20 PM me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@BrennanKMN yeah, I wouldn't put 11 in my VTX and I have way more seating than a DD

@lakeaustinskier - I'm going to like that even though it is a nautique;) The only thing I didn't like about the gs20 was the flex in the walkway with 180 lbs on it. I shudder to think what would happen with average surfer weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@jercrane I know they are rare but a Malibu FXi would be a great compromise. DD version of the VTX, good freeboard for rough water and seating for 10. I owned one for about 3 years before selling. The couple that bought it from me is selling. It's was listed on ski it again.

 

Scratch that....just found out it was sold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Thanks folks for the thoughts. Not sure where the 11 people threads came from. I have no need for 11 people. Occasional 9 for cruising. As I said in my original post. I never ski with more than 3 in boat and a skier. Also if the water is rough I’m not taking 9 out in the boat. We’re talking sunset cruises on calm water. We sort of got a whole bunch of issues conflated in this thread. Oh well.

 

The need for 9 is really about marine patrol not giving me a ticket. I’ve actually taken 9 in the 197 cruising and it was fine. Our marine patrol will ticket you based on placard limits though. The 200 solves this problem.

 

The rough water questions were just potential side benefits. If I don’t solve that problem that’s fine. Not willing to trade off slalom wake for that.

 

Also I don’t think I’ll ever own a boat without ZO, at least until something better comes along. It’s game changing in the course and just so damn easy to use.

 

Thanks

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@jercrane - pontoon is the way to go in my opinion. Upgrading to a 200 is cool too but it really won’t dramatically change your situation. Certainly some subtle benefits from a wake/ tracking perspective, but if I recall you are primarily free skiing correct? We have a 197 and a pontoon at the lake and have managed to keep tubing a pontoon activity only so far. The oldest kid is 13 and we can still make it fun for him.

 

When we have guests up or a big crew for skiing, we just stay close to the house and rotate the crew. Boat does get cramped with gear, and the storage in the gunnels like the 200, new Prostar, or new response is appealing. Eventually I will upgrade, but my 197 has been a great workhorse and I’m pretty vigilant about not burying the nose. Still happens occasionally...

 

Good luck with the course refresh!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help with the dilemma much as I own a closed bow 190, but boat on a very large lake, 9,212 acres. Our chop can get 1 foot with a little wind. It feels like my poor boat is going to break apart, but I cannot part with it. lol. A friend used to have a Malibu Sunsetter LXI, like mentioned before, it was a MUCH larger and higher freeboard than my little 190. The 200's I have been in do not seem to be any better at all compared to my 190, despite being MUCH larger.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

I think a lot of the responses here missed that the 9 person requirement wasn't to handle that many skiing or even in a skiing rotation. The original requirement was for that number of people for an evening cruise.

 

Keep the 197. Buy a larger, cheaper I/O with a deeper V for rough water and cruise/tube in that.

The worst slalom equipment I own is between my ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I'll third (or fourth) the pontoon idea. They're pretty versatile. You can tube behind them if the motor is appropriately sized (kind of pointless behind my 25 HP toon but I use that for putting around our smallish lake). You can easily fish off them. They work good, not great, in rough water. And it's nice not to be crawling over seats to move from one end to the other. You can bring out your dog. You can just pressure wash the carpet at the end of the year to clean it.

 

Looks for one with bigger tubes if you want better rough water handling. The newer ones all have 24"+ tubes, and float the platform higher.

 

Nice thing about pontoons is depending on your need for creature comforts and newness, you can usually get one for $5K that's in decent shape. Oh, and with an outboard, they're cake to winterize too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I believe your gains in switching to another direct drive inboard (that will also be compromised on certain missions with lots of passengers) are minimal and probably not worth the cash or the transaction. I totally understand not wanting to leave a real ski boat...so choices I agree with are:

 

--abandon some of the real ski boat capabilities (nope can't do it)

 

--Keep the 197 and hunt around for a decent, used, depreciated pontoon for people cruising.

 

--if the 197 is really cherry PM me details and what you want for it...sometimes when the little devil on my left ear whispers I listen, sometimes the angel on the right wins out!

 

And FWIW...I sure wouldn't be much concerned about the wear and tear pulling tube creates. We pull tube on our public lake with a 91 Centurion that is not screwed together like today's boats. We may have 3 big tubes back there at once and sometimes 12 teenagers of considerable size. She's holding together fine. If I had a 197 she'd be getting same duty on the public lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Sounds like the 2010 / 2011 Malibu FXI is your best bet here.

Designed with a higher freeboard to handle choppy water, built to accommodate 10 people, OB DD with all the amenities a family can ask for and all that based on the 3-Event proven sv23 cut diamond hull.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@6balls Its pretty damn nice. 350 hours, MCX, immaculate interior and exterior, Zero Off. I got it for a steal. I felt a little bad about it after in fact. Guy orders a new Prostar every 8 years so he didn't seem to mind.

 

Here she is during my last set of the year in the course.

 

be3ho75tw6j9.png

 

Sigh ... she really is a nice boat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@jercrane It's kind of funny how so many guys on here don't understand how much our lives can be controlled by that stupid capacity placard. Having mine say 8 instead of 6 when buying a boat was the biggest deal in the world...because of the darn fish cops.

 

Anyway, yes, I think you have understood your scenario quite well in the post you had with the bullet points of pluses and minuses. If you look at that, I think it's undeniable that you end up with a boat that fits your needs better in upgrading to a 200. Also, it seems like a 200 would fit your needs quite well and take away the need for a 2nd boat of any sort (or in your case a third).

 

However, I think that list looks similarly positive with a malibu TXi as well, and the nose is even harder to dip, so don't discount it - unless you just really don't like malibu, that's fine too.

 

I assume the reason you aren't looking at a new prostar is because the price difference would be so great since they weren't introduced until 2014? I've got that same problem too.

 

And amen, I really hate tubing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Lars oh interesting ... hadn't thought about going the mod route. hmmm.

 

@escmanaze sounds like I need to consider the malibu TXi as well. I'm not opposed to it I just sort of have a two track mind and really only ever think about Nautiques and Mastercrafts. My lake tends to be a pretty heavily biased Nautique lake too so maybe thats playing into some of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...