ColeGiacopuzzi

Heard the horror story on someone who thought that ad was real a while back. They lost a ton of money. 100% stay away.

Like @wolfeie said water is always in the back of our minds, but it is definitely one of the best places to ski hands down. Besides Florida the list of states you can ski comfortably from March to November is pretty rare. On top of that we have some of the most consistent ski conditions there is. @Fastguy888 I do think your costs are a bit over the top. Its not to that extreme. As far as the smell of manure you honestly don't even notice it after a while and only get it when the wind blows in a certain direction. I think its toned down over the years. There is so many great people at the lakes it makes up for the lack of amenities nearby as well. @rico is one of the newer owners he might chime in on this.

@ALPJr see correction.

@ALPJr It does not come with the insole the bottom of the chassis is now contoured.

@StevePops yeah I'd still go 67"

@StevePops 67” sounds like the go to for sure, but how tall are you?

@gavski @TFIN 67” numbers are:

 

29 3/4

2.510

6.825

.760

9

@skimtb no so 2019 is a completely different shape than 2020 We work in a 2 year cycle. 2020 was a new ski; 2021 is a refinement of the same shape. It’s usually smaller changes. Then 2022 is a new shape. I had mentioned earlier in this thread some key differences from the 19 to the 22, but stability, but also Read the paragraph above it has Some key things I think the 22 does better than any other ski.

@Ali you could go either way, but for 32mph I would probably go 67"

@BS74 for the most part everyone is riding 22 at this point. Some of us are riding 22s very early on and are testing it in the spring and summer with 21 graphics. Some of the team just doesn't want to commit and make the switch to the new graphics ski in between big events since it can be a little bit of an adjustment; Also its a worlds year so everyone wants to be on top of their game.

@Skiboy35 for a 68" id go:

30 1/4

2.505

6.830

.765

9

 

@BS74 go for the 22. you wont be disappointed.

If anyone is on the edge about going to this event; highly recommend it!

@C5Quest @TFIN sent me his numbers and I tweaked them a bit this past weekend and landed at and really like:

This is for 66”

29 5/16

2.498

6.830

.755

9

@A_B On 2020 I landed and stayed at:

30 3/4

6.832

2.511

.765

Give that a try and let me know how it goes!

@zman Yes for sure. I mean you’ll feel more of a difference in terms of stability, grip and how forgiving the ski is. Totally different shape.

@Kuba the biggest things you’ll feel between the and 21 and 22 is the 22 Pulls from ball to 1st wake better and it takes more angle And keeps building angle. Which in turn puts you in a better spot before the buoy to run that wider line because it creates more pace. The great thing about it too is you don’t feel like you have to climb over the front like you have in the past to get it to roll underneath you. With 22 the sweet spot is huge and wherever you’re standing on the ski coming into the buoy it just feels more automatic; it turns and goes.

@JuanJ Sounds like you're skiing well on the Radar, I'd go with a 21 Pro build for sure and get a 67".

68 is too big.

@mac Yes I used it for a while in the back half of recovery, definitely couldn't use it until I had most of my mobility back after the injury had healed quite a bit. I had a partial labrum tear. I used bands throughout my recovery more than anything though. 1 month off, 3 months PT, 3 months of working out before I skied.

@KRoundy we have actually had that for quite a number of years! Super good!

This thread went from exciting to distributing really fast.

@TonyT @C5Quest yes I usually always end up going a bit forward on most of our skis, I like a little bit more slide at the finish. @C5Quest just think slow out and slow up on that glide, control the line. The great thing people will find with this ski, is you don’t have that feeling that you have to climb up on it, it’s extremely forgiving and allows the ski to turn no matter where you’re. Also even if you make a mistake it still pulls and pulls and builds and creates angle better than any other ski I've ridden.

 

@SkiBadger id go 66” for sure.

@TonyT I’ve ridden quite a few settings on the ski, but always ended up back at:

66”

29 1/4

6.860

2.480

.761

9

That’s pretty close to stock.

I know quite a few of us on the team hover around there.

 

 

@Killer yes you can mount the boots on individual plates, so you can use it backed up to a release.

 

@ALPJr i apologize, I had some wrong info The boa dial is updated for the new boots little bit heavier duty. The bungee is the same just laced a bit different.

I wanted to chime in here and say this boot is awesome!! So stoked for everyone to try it. It was fun riding prototypes and only seeing it get better and better.

 

@ALPJr

Yes you can mount the boots super close to each other.

We still are using the the same Radar branded liners yes, which is made by intuition

As far as I know the BOA system & bungees are the same.

 

 

@DaddyC Don't be afraid to take those plastic pieces out. That might fix your problem.

@brettmainer I sent you a PM.