Exciting to read about, and great to see the energy and initiative for more sites. Some obvious thoughts come to mind. First, the size of our sport, in terms of participants, is somewhat correlated to the number of controlled sites. Just as alpine racing depends on a closed and controlled area, our sport, to a fair extent, depends upon controlled conditions. Therefore, any prospect of growth of competitive water skiing is dependent upon more sites. Build it and they will come? Maybe, and as long as there is a reasonable demand forecast, it is worth a shot. Next, other water sports disciplines do not share the same need for protected water. Starting with tricks, and going through the disciplines to wake, wake skate, surf--these events, to a better extent, can handle more open and public water (slower boat speeds, more "portable" i.e. can utilize different shorelines based upon wind, etc.). So, some of the comments made thus far in terms of skier preferences seeking ski specific sites are certainly with merit. If an objective of a slalom skier is to find a more controlled environment away from boat traffic, bringing some wake events to the skier honey hole can detract from the allure. Even tricks is often better on open water. But tricks is much more easily reconcilable with slalom; tricks does really well between the boat guides and turn buoys (so long as driver is skilled). Wake and surf are very challenged by narrow lake with a slalom course.