Jump to content

Vote for ZO mods?


skibug
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

Instead of another setting (rumor of "D"); what about a + or - for inbetween settings? I currently run B3 after skiing C2 for a while. I switched early this year because C2 was on me too early. B2, while picking me up later, didn't give me enough support out of the buoy so I have to compensate with the (3) setting.

 

I really think I would like a B2 "+" or a C2 "-" where the "+" and "-" would adjust / shift the position of the letter pick up point.

 

Anyone else have an opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

If is really better for the skiers I am for it but do not think it is needed.

 

What I want to see is a way to make any setting A2 or C1 feel the same between boat brands and motors. I understand that is a big request but it would be nice. Currently I run B2 for CP and Boo. C2 for CC and MC. What do I do when a 6 liter shows up? No idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

If is really better for the skiers I am for it but do not think it is needed.

 

What I want to see is a way to make any setting A2 or C1 feel the same between boat brands and motors. I understand that is a big request but it would be nice. Currently I run B2 for CP and Boo. C2 for CC and MC. What do I do when a 6 liter shows up? No idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
At what point are we giving the skier too many options? In my opinion, the typical tournament skier would be better off with less options as opposed to more. Admittedly I am just a class C hack, but the current system has 9 variables. +/- would make it 27.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
At what point are we giving the skier too many options? In my opinion, the typical tournament skier would be better off with less options as opposed to more. Admittedly I am just a class C hack, but the current system has 9 variables. +/- would make it 27.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporting Member

As a software developer myself, I can tell you that user parameters are very often the result of not quite solving the problem. The ideal software just does the right thing. Slightly less than ideal software can do the right thing with some strong hints from the user.

 

I think any software engineer's goal is ultimately to remove parameters except those that directly relate to something in the real world. If you have to enter how far apart the buoys are, that's totally fine: that can be measured. But "hacky" parameters like A/B/C and 1/2/3 are generally undesirable, and I strongly suspect the engineers at ZO feel the same way.

 

The problem is, they can't get a good pull for everybody without them -- YET.

 

So I strongly hope that the future, eventually, is for the control system to react correctly to whatever actually happens to it, and to have fewer or preferably no parameters.

 

BUT, in the shorter term, I'm not completely opposed to something halfway between B and C. I probably would use it, actually. Conceptually, I think C is the "best" pull, but I don't find it forgiving enough if I do something goofy at the end of the turn. So I ski B. B+ would definitely be worth a try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporting Member

As a software developer myself, I can tell you that user parameters are very often the result of not quite solving the problem. The ideal software just does the right thing. Slightly less than ideal software can do the right thing with some strong hints from the user.

 

I think any software engineer's goal is ultimately to remove parameters except those that directly relate to something in the real world. If you have to enter how far apart the buoys are, that's totally fine: that can be measured. But "hacky" parameters like A/B/C and 1/2/3 are generally undesirable, and I strongly suspect the engineers at ZO feel the same way.

 

The problem is, they can't get a good pull for everybody without them -- YET.

 

So I strongly hope that the future, eventually, is for the control system to react correctly to whatever actually happens to it, and to have fewer or preferably no parameters.

 

BUT, in the shorter term, I'm not completely opposed to something halfway between B and C. I probably would use it, actually. Conceptually, I think C is the "best" pull, but I don't find it forgiving enough if I do something goofy at the end of the turn. So I ski B. B+ would definitely be worth a try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
If "D" is really like PP, I bet a lot of skiers will use it. The problem (for me) with ZO is that (with any setting) if you hit the boat, it hits you back. Then, it's difficult, if not impossible to calm it down...... If "D" setting can smoothen that up, It will be a better pull (for me).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
If "D" is really like PP, I bet a lot of skiers will use it. The problem (for me) with ZO is that (with any setting) if you hit the boat, it hits you back. Then, it's difficult, if not impossible to calm it down...... If "D" setting can smoothen that up, It will be a better pull (for me).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...