Jump to content

New Reflex Supershell with R Style Rear Evaluation


Ed_Johnson
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

I have a few sets on the Supershell front and have not been as successful with it as I was on the black top so a took a good look at the both to try and determine what the difference is. I have the largest boot available size of both models. I have a 13b foot, its narrow and low volume. I've been using the Intuition Aqua liner and using a blue Superfeet insole. I had to cut the insole a little shorter and actually cut the area out where my big toe is to give it more room.

 

The overall length on the black top was 13" and 13 1/4" on the Supershell. However the Black top has a rounded rim around the tip that protrudes about 1/8". The Supershell is a little thicker so the interior length may be closer to 1/4' difference than the full 3/8".

 

Width at widest point Blacktop approx 4 3/8", Supershell is 4 5/8". Again the Supershell is thicker so it probably not a full 1/4" wider.

 

As stated the Supershell is thicker. This makes it noticeably heavier, not by a significant amount but if you pick one up and then the other you can tell a difference. This extra thickness makes them stiffer. I think this, as Ed Johnson mentioned, may be a major factor to the problem I'm feeling since I was coming off of T-factor bindings which are rubber.

 

The Supershell is a little more roomier especially in the toe area. This may be contributing to some of the difference I'm feeling because my foot is not quite as locked in as it was in the black top boots. I have some options to try and alleviate this such as remolding the liner, different insole. Shims for full length or just under heel (put under the liner to remove some volume), and/or Wearing socks.

 

One thing I found was that the heel cup adds no height to the heel area. If you take the heel cup off and place it under the boot the boot heel bottom actually protrudes past the cup bottom. I measured the heel piece height with and without the cup and it less than a 1/16" difference. I suspect when you are standing and putting pressure in the boot that small amount will go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Baller

@gregy ... I reset the back strap to the full forward position to give myself as much range as possible. As far as liners go, I use the Thin Reflex Front and Rear with a thick athletic Half Sock.

 

These are the most comfortable bindings I have ever used, with the greatest Range of COM Motion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@gregy, to help with toe volume issues, rather then building up underneath the foot, I like to pack things in on top. I currently use a shaped piece of old binding rubber, but have used things like 3/16" foam rubber matting. Keeps your foot grounded to the bottom of the shell, while filling the volume in from the top down.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Had my best set to date on the supershell today. I remolded the intiution liner. I had seen where it was recommended on snow ski boots to put a 2x4 under the front of the boot when molding. Putting the 2x4 under the front helps your heel get set in properly. I put almost no tension on the buckles. This combination seemed to take up the extra room.

 

The other problem was that the front of the ski kept catching on the turns with supershell vs the old black top. So I moved the Supershell back 1/8" (thanks to the mikro-just I added). That took out the tip sensitivity. For the first time I can say I liked the supershell better than the black top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Had my best set to date on the supershell today. I remolded the intiution liner. I had seen where it was recommended on snow ski boots to put a 2x4 under the front of the boot when molding. Putting the 2x4 under the front helps your heel get set in properly. I put almost no tension on the buckles. This combination seemed to take up the extra room.

 

The other problem was that the front of the ski kept catching on the turns with supershell vs the old black top. So I moved the Supershell back 1/8" (thanks to the mikro-just I added). That took out the tip sensitivity. For the first time I can say I liked the supershell better than the black top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I have been using double power shells for the last 9 years and decided to make the jump to the Reflex Poweshell with R Style this spring. Ordered everything from Miami Ski Nautique and had a great experience. I have modified a Poweshell and turned it into an R Styke and added buckles. Have not skied it yet, as our lakes are still frozen, but am excited to give it a rip. Here are some pics of the set up:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@gregy the contraption on the back of the rear boot is actually kitchen cabinet hardware. It allows me to deep water start with the rear boot off the ski. Once up on the water, I slide it into place and snap in. This significantly reduces stress on the lower back. I had the same system on my powershells and have been using it for approximately 7 years with great success. Here are a few more pics with the boot off the ski:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Chef23 It is very simple to get the back binding in place and snap in. It is similar to placing your foot in a rear toe plate. Once the latch on the back of the binding locks in, it does not come off. I have been using the Goode Powershells with this system and depended on the interlock as the release mechanism. Now with the Reflex Supershell, no need for interlock as the front boot releases independently from the rear boot. While using the Goode interlock system, I always feared that the back boot would somehow come off the ski and the front boot wouldn't. I don't think that would end very well. With the R Style, the liner simply comes out of the shell, so no need for interlock. For the record, the interlock system worked very well and I never had any issues with both boots releasing as they should. Had some pre-release situations that have motivated me to move to the Reflex system.

 

Keep in mind, if for some reason the rear boot did come off the ski, it is attached to your foot, so I don't think it will go to far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Very clever set up, do you reach down and release it if you are dropping for a rest? Then put it back in when you get up, I guess it just takes some practice, at first thought I would be worried about getting it back in time on short set-up situations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@RAWSki At each end of the lake, once I swing out to settle to shorten the rope, as I am sitting in the water, I reach back and open the latch, which removes the binding from the ski. Once I deep water start, I clip in and I am ready to go. Short set ups are sometimes a little stressful, but in those situations you have the option to deep water start with both bindings attached to the ski, so you don't have to stress about clipping in.

 

If you think about how many deep water starts you do in a week, they add up. Someone skiing skiing 2 sets a day, 4 days a week would average 60-80 deep water starts. That a lot of stress on the lower back. For someone who is trying to manage lower back issues, this set up is magic. All the benefit of a hard shell system with the flexibility to drag a foot on the start. I ski with a guy who is 72 and is still getting into 35 off. He is convinced that the reason he can still ski is because he uses an RTP and drags his foot on the start. I agree with his logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Found an hardshell boot that I started today to trim down to get R-style performance now it has lower height than the blue vapor even if it stands on the table and the hard boot is on the ski i just need to move one of buckles don't think i need to cut the front out or whats the reason Reflex do that? i can imagine the shell losen up a bit and get less stiff and moves with your motion more. Gonna try the vapor liner first before i buy the low profile reflex one zf2f6ficlgmi.jpg

gvspld3hw5s0.jpg

kr7qnv5qviow.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Milford great idea, bear in mind though that kitchen cabinet hardware are most likely made of a brass alloy that contains 2% lead which hardens the metal to avoid bending but under stress it can break. Make sure that the hinge you are using is made is a different metal, out of stainless steel if possible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
k i have now heat molded the shell so the front is more flat and gonna bolt it down so the toe box is flat against the binding plate, but its some tension in the shell and lifts in the rear so an wedge is prob needed but need that anyway (an normal hair dryer worked)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@milford I remember when we met on the dock at Laku for regionals years ago and we talked about that hardware on your back foot while you were fresh off your back surgery. I love when we find customs solutions that meet our specific needs. Glad to see that has held up for you all these years since!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@gregy @Ed_Johnson agree on the shim, take it step further stand on the floor as you do on the ski simulate an pull open to the the boat turn your hips and a bit of your spine as u normally do, now when you are at your max (open) lift the heel of the rear fot a bit and twist the rear foot as much as you can while the toes still remain on the floor (ski) check how much more you open up (stays open to the boat) test both onside and offside when i did it its ALOT more!!! now to the thingy is it possible to make the R- binding twist, yes i know its possible to do but is it possible to ski with it or learn to ski with it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
ok i think u missed me there the more u twist the rear binding = help you stay open more on one side but at the same time the other side gonna be more locked. what i ment in the previous post was if it was possible to get the best out of two worlds an rear boot that wasn't fixed in place or more that give you the ability to twist the rear fot in the course like you can do with an RTP but more. how to build it ftm dont know -sliding bearings some rubber think it need some resistance drag. in the video with Andy rtp myths he moves hes fot but very little to one side, i think some people can see the adv of it particular all of us that haven't that body made of rubber.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

The front Supershell will require some acclimation. Determining how much freedom of upper cuff articulation is key based on upper buckle tension and liner thickness, etc. Also some have reported more tip pressure by comparison.

 

Suggest you try sizing them first, e.g., my foot is US 11 but in an 8 Supershell with Intuition liner (heat molded). It’s very snug, but the sense of connection is much better, and after a few “break-in” sets the ischemia resolves. If currently using Intuition liners in the Powershells, it may be best to start with those in the Reflex.

 

Ultimately the Reflex R-style RB is a great choice imo. The inherent shape of it though allows a bit of medial-lateral rocking motion at the forefoot. This can be fixed by using a heat gun to flatten the forefoot (on a baking tin) and then an extra T-nut over the lateral toe portion to hold it down firmly on the mounting plate. This will also help prevent the screw mounts from working loose. Moving the rear large T-nut to the very back of the heel helps too.

 

The easiest transition would probably be Reflex FB/Wiley RB (not too snug). Personally I think the Reflex RB is safer though from the release aspect.

 

Be sure you dry test your FB release setting several times and not too much tension to release.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@Mark Poppleton I've been on double boots since the mid 80s. The R-style took some getting used to. At first I had a feeling my foot was going to come out off the wakes. After a couple of weeks I didn't even notice it anymore. I put a 3/16" spacer plate made out of Plexiglas and slotted out the holes in the boot for more rotation. That, to me made the setup feel much more comfortable. Loving it now after, been on it for about 6 months. The Black top was an easy transition from rubber boots. I didn't like the Supershells at first, the extra sensitivity took some getting used to for me. Glad I stuck with the supershells now, the black tops were too small and hurting my toes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

With the R-style you get that full forward and aft movement but the heel are still locked in as an full hardboot preventing any twisting left to right as u can do in an RTP that can help the hip stay more open. Dont know if its possible to modify the R-style to something like this trick binding without the rear heel buckle x2k2ps61fums.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
So i can stay more level with my shoulders to get an more symmetrical pull, and prevent too much twist on my spine have problem with my back and my hip flexors are very what do you say short or tight (not like an gymnast) On dry land holding onto a rope it feels like i can get my COM faster over my front fot and keep it there when twisting my rear fot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Than_Bogan it doesn't go on the ski, it is used for a toe pass instead of a traditional bear trap. It is made by Reflex.

 

@Fehlindra What benefit would an r-style rear with the heel cut out provide over a regular adjustable RTP? It seems to me the whole point of the r-style is more flexibility with the security of a heel while still allowing release similar to that of an RTP. If you cut the heel away, you are left with an expensive, hard, adjustable RTP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@jimski ... With the R-Style, getting the right spacing between the front and rear boot is critical. Because the R-Style has the nose cut off so much, it is really easy to get it closer to the front boot than anything you have used before. Moving the rear boot back will decrease the sensitivity much more than any fin setting would.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
@Fehlindra I am not sure you are going down the right path with your open hips idea. If you are interested in some comments on the subject please start another thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@gregy on a 67 tried the 15 and went back to the 14

I have the front boot as far back on the adjustment as it will go 29.5 I did move the rear r style boot back and it's as far back on the plate as it will go I will try it tomorrow not to sure what to do if it needs to go ack any further

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...