Jump to content

Anybody looking for a GREAT deal on a NOS '15 HO Syndicate V-Type? Read this!


DangerBoy
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

I just picked up a new 2015 67" HO Syndicate V-Type Blem for a mere $270 USD shipped. If anyone is in the market for a ski like this they still have a couple more 67s, 66s as well as some 65s and 63s I think at www.SkiPro.com in Arizona.

 

They have them on for $299.99 but if you apply this coupon code skipro102011 you'll get another 10% off B). Pretty good deal, methinks. The blems are all supposed to be minor and located on the topside, at or on very near the tip of the ski. I already ski on a blem ski so that matters not to me.

 

Get 'em while they're hot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@bigskieridaho Thanks for those settings. Will definitely give them a try. I'm curious to see how this ski will compare to my Monza which has been a very good ski for me. I'm hoping it'll feel and ski similarly but just be better in every way and help take my skiing to a new levels like the Monza did after I switched to it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@DangerBoy one of the guys I ski with went from a 2010 Monza to the 2015 V-Type and loves it.

 

I'm skiing on a 2016 Radar Vapor Graphite. Interested to see if I like it better or not. Figured it was worth a try at that price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@powbmps It's great to hear your ski buddy went from the Monza to the V-type and loves it. Very reassuring. I wonder what he thinks is better about the V-type. Does it do just certain things better or is just better in every way?

 

It looks like four people have bought one since I put this posting up. Those guys at SkiPro should be paying me a commission or something... ;)

 

You're right though, at that price you've got nothing to lose. If you don't like it you should be able to sell it for at least what you paid for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
So to add to the smokin' hot deal on the V-Type, I just picked up a pair of NOS/overstock Connelly Talon bindings (full back boot) for $100 SHIPPED. That's $370 for a package of new gear that would've retailed at around $2K three years ago and shipping costs are included in that $370. Boo-yah! :p
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@DangerBoy I asked my friend about a comparison. He said "I think it is much more stable through the wakes, and turns much easier." I've tried his V-type over the last couple days (with my Profile bindings) and am liking it so far. I'm a total hack, but to me it feels surprisingly stable as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Wow. I always found the Monza to be very stable and easy to turn. If the V-Type is even more stable and turns even easier, I think I'm really going to tear it up on that ski. I don't know if it is but if it's a little wider underfoot than the Monza, that would make me very happy as well. I skied a friend's 2018 Radar Alloy Senate this year and the only thing I liked better about it was that it's extra width made it noticeably a lot easier and less work to get out of the water on than my Monza. If the V-Type also happens to be a little wider and is a little less work to get up on than the Monza, that would be terrific but I'll happily settle for easier turning, more stability and hopefully also faster and more fun to ski.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@bigskieridaho I'm aware of that. I know the A3 tail is narrower than what the S2 had but don't know anything else about the S2 . Were they any wider underfoot than the Monzas or about the same?

 

Regarding those settings you gave us for the 67", are those with the tip weight forward, aft or off or does it not matter? TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@DangerBoy So the V Type is going to ride deeper in the water than the monza. As far as width I would put it on the same spectrum as the Monza. The V Type is decently fast, but not as forgiving as the monza was. Both were very sensitive to fin and boot settings. The settings I gave you are pretty evenly weighted. I do have others if those don’t work. I liked those the best. This is only my opinion of this ski so might work better for you. I went from a Radar to this ski, and now back on a Radar again. Not sure if this helps, but feel free to ask anything else you got.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@bigskieridaho my terminology is probably incorrect, but would your settings be considered a bit longer/shallower than the H.O. recommended settings? What do you feel are the benefits to going that route?

 

Brought the borrowed H.O. ski home to check the fin settings, and found this whacked out setup:

 

Jg6pPM7.jpg

 

Adjusted to factory recommended settings. Looking forward to trying it out.

 

ZqR3vmH.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I loved the V type. Had I not run it up on some rocks at nationals in Texas last year I would still be riding that. Not the fastest ski in the world which I like bc when I am on an excessively fast ski I end up with slack at the ball every time. Very stable, controlled turns, finishes with TONS of angle. I ran stock everything
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@Chef23 I've been printing up paper templates from CAD (to the measurements shown on H.O.'s website), and using those. It was wayyyy long and deep. About 3/16" of the vertical leading edge of the fin was exposed below the ski.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@powbmps @DangerBoy Stock dampener settings which really doesn’t seem to do much and the fin settings actually came from a pro that is about the same size as me that was on a 67” as well. Stock didn’t work at all for me. Try stock and go from there if you want. I have other settings that didn’t work for me but may for you. Just toy with it and figure it out. Buy a good set of tools/calipers so you can dial it in. Moving boots Can always be a factor also.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@powbmps thats what I tried as well, minus the box in front and back boxes. Which are those to do wing angle with a ruler? Or also DFT?

 

Few things A when you print you dont necessarily get true 1:1.

B: dft measurements are weird due to slot flat or needle measurements being slightly different.

C: best length tips or flat wont match what you printed.

 

I think its a better way, you could easily add this to the fin measurement app as long as you had a print adjustment to scale it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@BraceMaker the DFT measurement baffles me. There is so much angle on the tail, I was just measuring to the start of the slope up. Of course it's a rounded edge, so that doesn't work well either. I suppose I'll just try it and tweak as necessary.

 

For the fin angle, I have a couple plastic hotel room keys cut to specific angles, but I just ordered a wing angle gauge set and 8" calipers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I find this discussion of precise fin and boot settings interesting and useful but I can't help but think that given the large amount of error introduced by my much less than precise technique and the variability of my positioning, timing, weighting, etc., on every single turn, that to be precise down to even hundredths of inches let alone thousandths in fin settings seems a bit overkill to say the least. I'm sure that being precise to that level in all the settings makes sense for really good skiers with really precise and highly repeatable technique but for a hack like me striving for such precision doesn't seem to make as much sense. Once you get to a certain level of precision - which I suspect is nowhere near the thousandths or even hundredths of inches for me - it becomes impossible to differentiate between error caused by non-ideal settings and non-ideal technique when trying to assess what's wrong or right with my turns.

 

That being said, I will be trying the settings people have found to work well on the new V-Type until I find something I like. I remember that I couldn't turn my Monza at all when I first got it but after moving the bindings forward and tweaking the fin settings a bit, I now find it super easy to turn so I do believe that settings can make a big difference. It's fair to say, however, that part of that is due to the fact that my technique and ability improved a considerable amount since I got that ski. Whether getting the settings right for me helped in any way to facilitate that improvement is really hard to say. Much of it, I think, was simply due to the huge superiority of the Monza over my previous ski which was a HO Mach I. Just having a ski that turned so much better, could hold so much more angle and hold that angle with such increased stability allowed me to take my skiing ability up several levels in pretty short order. I'm sure that getting the settings right had something to do with that as well but since I went from an old tech and design recreational level ski to what was considered a cutting edge high performance tournament level ski at the time obviously had a lot to do with my improvement also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
You would be surprised. A ski not set to at least the manufacturer's numbers can perform very poorly. If your skiing the course your really looking for precise and highly repeatable technique. Maybe not as much if your free skiing but I would think that still would be the goal. Either way to give that ski a fair chance I'd get the fin pretty close to where the people that made it says it belongs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

That's awesome news! :)

 

I live in Canada so to take advantage of the free shipping I had my ski sent to a border town in MT. A friend of mine who lives just across the border from that town is picking it up for me and will bring it up to where I live the next time he comes up to visit his son. As such, it might be a number of weeks before I get to unbox mine. I sure am anxious to see it though. :#

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.@DangerBoy thank you so much for the tip! I almost bought an lesser ski for $200 more.

 

I love it so far, turns like a dream. I don't think I could ever reach this ski's max potential but it will sure be a lot of fun trying to get ten tenths out of it.

 

My only complaint is that the ski tends to send a lot of high velocity spray right at my left calf so that when I finish a run it feels like my leg has been hit with a pressure washer. Most definitely a technique issue on my end and not the ski's fault, but it's painful nonetheless.

 

Even so, I have absolutely zero buyer's remorse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@btb24 You're welcome for the tip. I'm glad that you and a few others were able to jump on and get that smokin' deal as well and I hope everyone who did is liking their new ski.

 

As far as the painful ankle spray issue, I've had that problem with other skis but fortunately, it's an easy fix. I just wear a neoprene spray protector like this. https://bartswatersports.com/catalog/Wetsuits/Wetsuit_Accessories/Body_Guard_Neo_Spray_leg/index.asp

 

I started wearing one years and years ago. I then changed skis and have kept on wearing it even though I'm not even sure I need to anymore. I'm so used to having it on, I feel uneasy and out-of-sorts when I forget to put it on and tend to be tentative and not turn near as hard as I can on my off-side because I'm always worried that I'll get the painful cutting pressure washer spray across my right ankle (left foot forward skier) when coming into an off-side turn. When I put the sleeve on, I never think about that happening so always give 'er wild open on both sides. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@btb24 you are experience spray leg ... it will go away as the calf will develope an almost "callous" feel to it. @DangerBoy I was too late to the game on this and the 67's are now sold out. Guess it's another season on my A2. Not like that is a bad thing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Glydon They appear to still have the 67 in the Black/Olive color. If you select the thumbnail with the yellow bottomed ski then you can select 67 for length. I ordered mine in this color last week because the all black were sold out in 67. The 67s are listed for $369 but that goes to around $330 with the coupon code mentioned in first post.

 

gblop4ewu9tg.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I found the "blemish" on mine, and it's really nothing. And, if I was a customer in store and purchased the ski, it wouldn't have been a discounted blemish. There's a dimple on the front right side, below the paint that is the size of a ball point pen. That's it. I didn't take this ski to the lake this weekend. Being a holiday weekend and having a full crew in the boat, I knew that there wouldn't be good conditions to ski in, and it would get beat up some in the boat, and it's so pretty, that I can't do that to it...yet. :smile:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...