Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
Posted
Does anyone have an answer on this? I started thinking about the weight vs boat equation and how much extra weight must hurt skiers trying to to get down -41. I'm thinking Parish would be the largest / heaviest but I have no idea what he would wight in at. At some point north of 210 - 220 the weight has to be a really really big disadvantage making -41 almost impossible unless you have a seriously dialed in ski / setup. It seems in the modern era that smaller guys are getting it done and despite better equipment, new ZO, ropes, skis we are still not seeing many big skiers getting into -43.
  • Administrators
Posted

When Nate first hit the scene a number of pros went on crazy diets to try to get as light as Nate. Year's later Pros all want to be light but put more focus on strength. Point is light is good but not holy grail.

 

(I am always trying to be lighter but not trying hard enough)

 

  • Baller
Posted
I didn’t say fat @liquid d!! And to be lumped it the same group as CP and Freddie I would say is pretty bada$$. I like Ben and respect him a lot, he’s helped me along the way. But evidently @lpskier doesn’t think so.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...