Jump to content

When setting a fin how close is close enough?


bojans
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

Setting up my son's new ski last night and I got each measurement down to the thousandth. Once I tightened up the block fin length was off by 0.003". Several cycles of this later I called it good with dft off 0.001, depth off 0.002 and length off by 0.002.

How close to actual fin measurements do you try to get to before calling it good? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

DFT is often the most critical, followed by depth and then Length.

I would say .001 can not be felt and .005 could be a real difference. So the useful margin of error is somewhere in between.

If you are trying to nail someone else numbers or factory numbers the method of measurement is critical. If you measure slightly differently then the person who supplied the settings you will get a different number. 

In the end if is all relative. If you have your numbers and you want to get back to that setting exactly you will feel the delta. If you are trying to hit someone else's settings or the factory settings then you do not even know if they are right for you. In that case close is close enough.

As @mike_mapple  implied the higher level the skier the more critical. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I don't believe any two people will get the exact same numbers measuring the same ski even with the same set of calipers unless it's an accident, let alone measuring different skis of the same model with a different set of calipers.   So I personally believe you are close enough for a starting point.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@mike_mappleyou dad (the GOAT) adjusted my fin about "a thumbnail" between passes.  That's my kind of adjustment the rest is on me.  I ran to get us pizza for lunch while the others took their sets--Andy was so thankful for some pizza.  Great skier for sure but just a great guy to be around.  Very humble, great humor--obviously incredible talent. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@ral NO! I have digital. Analog is FAR superior.

This error was caused by fin set up too early in the day and not enough coffee.

I still ran 35s and had no idea why the ski felt so odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Horton, I love the analog Mitutoyo. A work of art. I also almost only use mechanical watches. Got to love them!

@ColeGiacopuzzi, compare apples to apples. Digital Mitutoyo are more precise, accurate and consistent than analog Mitutoyo, which are probably more consistent than a USD 20 digital caliper. But for sure USD 20 digital calipers are way more consistent than USD 20 analog calipers. 

Analog calipers have advantages in some conditions, like high magnetic fields, or extreme temperatures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@ral I own Mitutoyo digital as well as a number of sets of economical digital. I abandoned them all and went back to analog for reliability.

especially on hot days I can't tell you how many times I got crazy numbers. changed the batteries, try it again. got crazy numbers and then pulled out analog and everything worked.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

ok you knuckle draggers can make fun but I had issues with a number of sets of expensive digitals. At my old house my original shop had a roll up door that faced west. I pretty much had to have it up to work and it was often hot as balls. I found that if my hands were sweaty sometimes it made the calipers give CRAZY numbers. It took my a long time to figure it out. Originally I thought it was batteries but I ruled that out. 

The part I never understood was the fact that Mitutoyo claims they are "resistance to dirt, oil, and water".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

When shopping for Mitutoyos make sure you visit their website to check if the store you buy from is a verified retalier.

Lots of clever made China copies out there that may or may not work well in damp condittions.

The coolant proof digimatic reads well even with moist on ski and hands, I use the regular and have not had any issues. Cheap digital is useless if water is involved.

Edited by DanE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@DanE pretty sure mine are legit & are the coolant proof digimatic. Although it never occurred to me they could be fake.  my theory is moisture is not bad but sweat is. 

Whatever the analog always works 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...