Jump to content

KD Krypton Fusion - first ride 28/32/35 at 34 mph


Horton
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

Mid-range skis are a hard to define category of slalom skis. They are a version of the highest possible performing ski with extra stability added in. The KD Krypton Fusion provides surprising performance for a ski in this category.

I had no idea what to expect for my first ride on the KD Krypton Fusion. I started at 30 MPH and 28 off. Six passes later I ran a relatively routine feeling 34 mph 35 off pass. The ski is great through 35. Maybe 35 is pushing the limit for this design but not by much.

Is it a ski that I think I should try to run 38 off on? No. I have run plenty of 38s on the KD Titanium. For skiing at 38 or shorter, the Titanium is the right ski.

The video is from my first ride with bone stock settings. You will see a few bobbles but for a first ride this is sort of bonkers. This ski is really really good.

https://kdskisusa.com/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

So that looked pretty good out of the box.  I haven't had a ride on something less than what was thought to be a top tourney ski since I was a teen.  With that--what about it makes you say no to 38?  More specifically what does it's tool box lack for shortline?  

It seemed to be maybe you were down course a bit, the ski had a larger turning radius but was very smooth.  Could it be dialed thru settings?  Might it be better than a higher end ski for certain skiers challenging 35/38 who are not top-shelf amateur level in their technique?

No skepticism, just honest questions.  That was a pretty good first ride, especially early season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@6balls

Wider skis make a little less speed into the wakes, slow down a little slower, don’t get quite as wide, and turn slower than real top-of-the-line skis. In exchange for all that they are more stable and easier to ride. The slow turns you see in the video are evidence that I am riding this ski near its logical limit. (Yes, I know some pro skier cold ride could run 39 on it but that is every ski.) On a Titanium, the path would be wider and the turns would be sharper.

I guess I could spend time adjusting how I ski on it and then tweak the fin and bindings. It is fun and easy to ride but I can not imagine that after 35 off a high-end ski like the Titanium would be clearly better.

All that said, this $750 ski really is as good or better than a lot of $1,800 skis I have ridden over the years.

 

@Cooper_Trelawney

Riding all sorts of skis is my one and only talent. I have learned a lot over the years but suspect I have lost some balls along the way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@horton thanks sounds like a cool ski.  Would it be better for the 15-32 off crowd than a high-end tourney ski in terms of their progress and ability to handle certain ski characteristics (until they progress beyond and need that high end ski?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@6balls Yes that is the idea. It is really ideal for 15 to 28 off. At 32 off it is about time to get off a mid range ski. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

I'm not sure about the Wide Ride width at the bindings. The KD is certainly wider than the other skis you mentioned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@Ali

roughly a quarter inch wider at your front toes. 1/4-in in water ski width language translates to "$h*t-ton" wider in English

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@horton so how to market that to an intermediate skier.  Hey this will not be as fast, won't get you as wide and won't turn as tight, but it's the right ski for you at this time in your progression?

I've got a few nephews that only began course skiing recently and are running 32/15, 34/15, some 34/22.  Are these guys better off on a ride like the Krypton Fusion?  I sold 'em both Vapor Lithiums when I was done with them.  Price was right.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@6balls do you put a rookie driver in a GT2 or something less radical? The Fusion is less radical but still really good. Choose the right tool for the job.

Everything is a trade off. Personally I like stable skis but you can't have a ski that is super fast, turns super hard and is super stable. 

For the cost this ski is hard to beat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Hortonfor a minute can we put price aside and compare again. My PB is 3@28 off at 36mph 20 years ago now I occasionally get close to running 34/22 or some 36/22. I ski on a 2014 prophecy and enjoy a fast ski. I was on the first f1 then the 08 and 12 prophecy’s. 
 

so if price as aside would I do better on a midrange ski like this KD or say a c85? Which would help me progress more. Would I ski better on this Kd than my prophecy? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@GregHind

I haven't seen you ski on your ski and I avoid direct comparisons to other brands but the likelihood that you would do better on a mid-ride ski is high.

A well designed wider ski is going to be less reactive in a number of positive ways.

The skis that you've been skiing on have more a tendency to go from hard edge to heart edge. That makes it harder for you to keep your hips over your feet and control what's happening. Those kinds of skis often put skiers in a defensive posture. A wider, less aggressive ski allows the skier to stay centered and more in control, especially through edge change and into pre-turn.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Is anyone riding this ski at 32 mph? I am thinking of loaning mine to a skier who just went from 34 to 32 mph and runs into 38.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Horton Could you tell me what size fusion you tried, couldn't find the size in any of the discussions.  Also, how did it feel at 30mph.  Did you only try 28 off at 30 or shorter lengths?  Lastly, do you know if it's a wider ski that a Senate, also your weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

I was on a 66

I weigh 180 -185

I did not ( or don't remember ) skiing at 32 or 30

It is similar size as Senate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@Mose

100% always go for the highest spec materials that you can afford. The difference is unquestionable ( should be unquestionable but I'm sure some knucklehead it's going to disagree )

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Horton  Thank you.  I couldn't find your chart any where on their KD USA site.  I took a set yesterday and  couldn't make it work at all.  Not knowing where to start, I set binding at 29 in, close to the Platinum setting. Driver thought the water was breaking way back on the ski.  You said you used stock so I assume 29 3/4.   I'll go way forward on next set and see what happens.   I found  the Europe chart,  not sure why the chart settings are so different.  

 KD Europe: 2023 Krypton Fusion

KD KRYPTON CARBON & KD KRYPTON - FACTORY SETTINGS SIZE BINDINGS FIN LENGTH FIN DEPTH FIN DFT WING 66” 29 1/4” 6.800 2.495 0.78      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@BS74 any update on your demo of this ski? Curious what your thoughts are. Now that the Goode Ventura has been announced, seems like another similar mid level ski albeit at a higher price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...