Help me understand. Legitimately. I am a strong skier advocate and in general a “live and let live” kind of guy.
If it’s a temporary course, when it’s not in use and sunken, does it restrict anyone from doing what they want?
I get the potential objections to noise and shoreline distance ordinances.
@ScottScott makes a good point that people associate speed with wake damage, and that is just a case of not thinking things through.
@slow makes a good point that the majority of lakefront owners aren’t skiers so property valuation is probably impacted
What is our best “pitch” that we can all use (with facts, studies, empirical evidence, logic, and physics) that we could build and publish to help out our fellow skiers?
If you ask me, the waterski association would be better served publishing documentation like this along with positive PR than working on more arcane competition rules.
Just my $.02