@ozski, @horton and I have discussed quite a bit but I always urge people that there may be magic numbers but the skier definitely is a huge factor. Your settings are very similar to some settings @skijay slid my way, but you're a little further forward, a little longer and slightly further from the tail. @skijay spent some time helping Gordon Rathbun setup his @Connelly_Skis_Inc GT. He also had some deeper, shorter numbers too. I will share some options and also say, fin numbers for me are still a work in progress, but I got my originals from Fred Halt when he first gave me a Connely to try. I keep going back to something close to those numbers. They are:
2.523
6.810
0.725
Wing at 7 or 8 depending on the water.
Bindings: 29.125
That having been said, I think a lot of people will want a little more length than that, just don't go so long that you have to pull all the way to the buoy.
I have had some luck with students and others I train with using more average numbers like:
2.512
6.850
0.745
Wing at 8 and bindings the same as above.
@skijay would you like to throw out your shallow/long numbers and your deep/short numbers?