I am not being a jerk, it’s that someone had to call you out on this. Than, you brag on one ski company nonstop for two year. That ski company released two new fins, a new wing, and a fin block that will adjust depth on one side of the fin independently of the other and all that is “good”. Then Connelly comes out with a ski with three different tail options and all the sudden options are bad?
How else did you expect us to interpret your post?
I agree with post above, I want a ski that feels good at stock settings, but for the skiers who like to tweak, let them have as many tail options as they want.