Jump to content

FORMAT CHANGE? FORMAT CHANGE? FORMAT CHANGE!!


Ham_Wallace
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
This discussion is where the rubber meets the road! We need ideas for the committee to watch. Whats wrong with 2 pass, 2 boats, head 2 head slalom? you could ski 2 skiers, passes each in 2 minutes, then the next two and so on. 50 skiers could ski their first round in 50 minutes. that would be 3 rounds in 1 1/2 hours. Hello! Jumping 2 boats, 2 jumps per skier, head 2 head, elimination. Tricks: (Boat draw, no choice) 2 boats, tricking from each end, 20 sec. passes, head 2 head, elimination. (no ski changes, no rope/handle changes. You lose twice in any event, you are out. Skiers would ski multiple days during the week. No Senior judges until the finals. With enough skiers and families on site for a week, manufacturers and vendors would rent booth space and stick around all week! OH Yeah! OPEN skis all events last of the day. The Open Finals would be last event of the tournamenT! $.02
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Ham, Some great Ideas. We have jumped both directions in a tournament. (for bonus points in our team event) If you do not ride out jump 2 NO JUMP 3 FOR YOU!! I think 4 pass limit in slalom. Top 10 go to a Final. Tricks eliminate timing...most tricks down and back allow 1 fall. You fall going down they pick you up keep tricking the same direction.

Just trying to think outside the box. Just throwing ideas out.

 

Chest Bump

 

Jeff Lindsey

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
@horton instead of through a ring of fire how about if you fall on a jump you have to stay in the location you landed while the rest of the competitors try to clear you? Should up spectator participation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
For Slalom how about some type of automatic rope winder with no stopping. rope would automatically go to the next loop as you exit the gates and just keep going into your next pass, no let up, way more aerobic. Of course it would only work at sites big enough to spin at each end, and everyone would have to deal w backwash from previous passes, but conditions would be basically equal for all skiers. Sure would make for some quick rounds though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Problem statement- we need more money

 

We keep focusing on the revenue line and not the expense line

 

The most simple solution that I dont hear discussed enough is getting rid of officials. (meaning hotel rooms) Use the competitors, reduce to class C, except for open and masters. Big savings!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Well B3 tricks at Nationals this year was in the 3 minute/skier range with falls and ski changes. Skier and boat ready on deck. It maybe that running 2 boat slalom (on deck skier immediately ready to go) saves a lot of time - allowing format changes. I know the 2 driver issues - but it seems to work at the Big Dogs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@wish tylocal set down times at WPB (and SMRR last year) are 35-40 seconds basically from the time the skier sinks into the water. So "exit gate - shorten - entrance gate" time is well less than 2 minutes. Figure 6 minutes a slalom skier under normal curconstances. Trick and Juno is slightly shorter unless it's the young or older groups. They take more time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I think three judges are more than sufficient. I see as many bad calls at the Nationals than a local tournaments, maybe more. If we reduce the complexity of multiple videos, etc, etc we can reduce cost and frustration. This is not the Olympics, and no ones future multi-million dollar contract depends on the outcome.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...