Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
Posted
Those pics looks exactly how i teared my Achilles and ended my season early August...

My ski finish in 16.95 but my ass is out of tolerance!

  • Gold Member
Posted

A: None of that. But since I've never seen 41, I guess I don't know for sure.

 

And I'll be the ahole who points out she didn't get the quarter anyhow :(.

  • Administrators
Posted
@Than_Bogan look again she has an orange sticker on her ski. Makes it look like she did not get the quarter but she definitely did. If you look at the second image she is 6 inches away from getting the quarter. she may have actually deserve half. I think they did score her a quarter.
  • Baller
Posted

Could be 1/4, or not. Would like to see boatcam and more frames, but it appears that the

ski is heavily grazing if not riding over the buoy enough to sink it a lot.

  • Baller
Posted
i have seen a few skiers using the r -style shell with a full height liner. the majority i've seen use some kind of wrap around velcro strap to keep the tongue and flaps from catching water.
  • Baller
Posted
You only have a split second to go for it or bail out. I commend her for the guts to go for it. I tend to bail since the Achilles rupture. Never want to ensure that again
  • Baller
Posted
I believe Whitney was using a vapor rear boot, modified until recently. For feel and comfort I can imagine her using the vapor liners. Amazing skiing
  • Gold Member
Posted

Veering into a new topic, but I would love to see the "significantly displaced" rule just go away. It creates confusion and frankly asks the judge to do something impossible.

 

I wonder if anybody has ever tried to measure just how much one can displace a buoy. My instinct is telling me that at these speeds and durations, estimating water as incompressible is roughly correct and therefore buoys simply don't displace.

 

But who cares if they do? Why not simplify the judge's task and just judge the ski relative to the buoy? I really don't see any problem with this. Could somebody really evolve a technique that intentionally displaces buoys and gains an advantage? I doubt it, but I say we cross that bridge if we ever come to it.

  • Baller
Posted
No expert here, but as I understand the rules, her front foot needed to beak the "X-Y Plane" which runs perpendicular to the course and through the buoy center line. In the second pic she is still a little short, but got there to be awarded 1/4. She likely lost the handle before her front foot turned and broke the "C-D Plane" running parallel to the course through the center line of 2,4,6.
  • Baller
Posted
Hard to tell what it looked like at full speed but I would have said it is a 1/4. I watched it live on the webcast and was glad she was ok because it looked like she could have gotten twisted around.
  • Administrators
Posted
I generally make fun of any judge who calls a quarter ball. It is extremely rare for a skier to actually score a the quarter. From the vantage point I took these pictures this may be a legit quarter. I would have to see it from another angle. Based on the pictures I took I would give her half.
  • Baller
Posted
@Horton from stills I agree that it could be a half. At full speed it looked like she lost the handle almost simultaneously with getting the ski to the width of the ball. I agree that it is very unusual for the ski to not round back toward the wake even a little which results in a half.
  • Baller
Posted
@Horton The answer to your question is dependent on the age of the person you are asking. When I was her age, I healed a lot quicker. Now, I would have just looked at the ball as I rode 10 feet inside it. Of course, that would have been at 28off, not 41.
  • Baller
Posted
Tough call and always is in 1/4 vs 1/2. What I see is in the 2nd picture, she has the handle, in control, and buoy appears to be showing up at her front foot. In the next picture, she loses the handle, so I'm in the camp of 1/4 buoy.
  • Baller
Posted

I also think its really hard to tell based on the photos and what happened between the two but wow that is a tough call to make regardless. To @horton point on 1/4 being basically useless - at that line length is it really physically possible to get a 1/4 if the skier is still holding on for more than a split second past the buoy when the ski is that close to the ball? My thought is the skier would essentially have to be letting go in the next 6" to not have started to cross the buoy line.

 

Look how much distance passed between the two photos using that circled weed as an estimate. That weed was in front of the bow is now behind the windshield and Whitney is still accelerating on the boat by the unofficial distance measurement of her right leg.

 

tpla0c6ay8kp.jpg

 

  • Baller
Posted

Kelvin had blow up of frame with her front boot right at the ball, Seemed close at that point.

 

Edge of ski was past center line of ball.

 

Two days there, she ran 39 all four times, I think she got 3@41 twice at least.

  • Baller
Posted

On Regina's your getting to see 60 FPS, not just 6 FPS like Whitney. Also, Regina's was a real air-inflated buoy, not a bubble buoy - makes it even more remarkable that she didn't splat (or more likely that is was just a grazing).

 

  • Baller
Posted
Interesting to me that when I was getting started, I always watched the women ski for their slalom technique, while the men were kamikazes who just attacked and used brute force to get it done. Not that the top guys aren't going for it now, but the top two women (at least) today seem totally willing to splatter themselves for an extra 1/4. It's fun to watch them because they're incredibly competitive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...