Jump to content

Comparison between 97’ PS205 and Malibu sunsetter LXi


pjnyk
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Looking at getting in on the used tow boat market and narrowed it down to two options. The PS has about 800hr and 140hr on a rebuilt engine. The Malibu has 1585hr. I typically slalom ski and barefoot. Not running the course with this boat. Malibu is priced at 22k with tandem trailer and PS is priced at 18.8k with trailer and boom. Both are in pretty immaculate condition. Just looking for general opinions, leaning towards the Malibu at the moment.

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
Very comparable boats, if barefooting is a priority that would tilt the needle towards the Malibu. You might peruse the Malibu Crew forum and see feedback from Sunsetter owners, they seem to really like them. The MC is also a good boat, I don't think you would be going wrong with either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 1999 Sunsetter LXI and it's been a great boat. I use it for slalom only and at 15 off it's got a good wake from 26-34mph. I've pulled other skiers up to 35 off and while it's not the same wake as the newer boats, they were still able to run the course. The prior owner used it primarily as a barefoot boat, so I would assume it's good for that. The price seems pretty high, I'm getting ready to list mine with around 820 hours and was going to start a few thousand below that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

If the malibu has the monsoon motor and a wedge then the price is not high. This is one of the best all around hulls you can find and they don't last long around here when they come to market at the price you quoted. You can ski , trick, wake board, surf and barefoot all on one boat. Probably toss in jump too but none of us do.

I have two ski partners with one (2003 , 2005) - both are excellent and would be great for what you are after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

we love our sunsetter LXI - great slalom wake for the 15-22 off skiers in my boat. I agree that price is high - i paid less for a 2003 with 400 hours a few years ago.

 

With that many hours I would want to see a compression check and see numbers at least 160 PSI per cylinder. They had 4 engines choices so that makes a difference. I would also want to see some maintenance records

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Nole_Skier @UWSkier @S1Pitts @Ski_Dad thanks guys. So keep in mind this is in CAD, it comes with the wedge and the ad says it’s got a 350hp motor, not sure if that makes it the monsoon or not. And it’s a 99, stored indoor through the winters. Was still thinking 22k is high considering the hours.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Not to geek out, but......

 

For some reason the Sunsetter LXi isn't in the 1999 Malibu Brochure. Only direct drive version is the LX. The base motor was 350 cubic inches and 310 h.p. Monsoon 325 made 325 hp. No 350 hp motor available. Sunsetter LX is 21' long with a 93" beam.

 

The Sunsetter LXi shows up in 2000, but same base 310 hp motor and Monsoon 325. Still no 350 hp motor. LXI is 8" longer and 1/2" wider than the LX model. Back end of the hull "overhangs" (notched out?).

 

Last two digits of the hull number will tell you the year.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Careful with the Sunsetter LX. I believe most of those do NOT have the SV23 Diamond hull and are not the greatest for slalom skiing.

 

All Sunsetter LXIs are on the Diamond hull and ski great as mentioned above. I had a 2002 Sunsetter (not LX or LXI, just a plain Sunsetter which was made only in 2002). It was available with the SV23 Diamond hull or the SV23 Wake hull, I had the Diamond hull version. Exact same running surface as the LXI but the trunk was shorter in the back. Skied identically to the LXI and was a foot shorter so it fit in my garage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my ski partners has A 99 SS LXI Carburetor engine 310 HP. The injected version was also available I thought 335 HP. but not sure. Its on the SV23 hull and is a very nice ski. And not a bad footer boat but then I have footed but am not A footer guy so I think its a good setup for both. The last good SS LXI for skiing was the 04. I think the DD came out mid season 99.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@powbmps it’s the LXi for sure, has the overhang at the back with the larger trunk. Person making the ad could have it wrong I guess, hopefully it’s the monsoon as I’ve heard plenty of good things
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Engines would be 310 HP carb or 325 Monsoon most likely. Not sure if they had the Hammerhead in 99 but if they did, that'd be 365. These are all bloated Indmar ratings of course.

 

Hope for the 325 Monsoon. Those are bulletproof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I have an 01 Sunsetter lxi with the 325 Monsoon and its an amazing boat. Plenty of room for friends but still has very good slalom wakes. I would highly suggest that the SS lxi is the way to go
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@pjnyk I skied 34 and 36 MPH behind my Sunsetter. In 2009 I traded it for a new Response LXI. In my opinion (28 off skier) the Sunsetter was not holding me back. The wake is just a tad bit better on my Response but not to the point where I skied better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@UWSkier probably a dumb question but when I go to take a look I should be able to tell which motor it is when I open up the hatch and look or by checking out the serial number right? Don’t want to end up with a carb.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

My guess is that the seller is confusing cubic inches (350) with horsepower. I have an '04 Response LXI with the Monsoon 340hp (350 ci). As far as I know, that was the max horsepower for the Monsoon at that point in time (short of the hammerhead, which I don't believe was branded Monsoon). Pretty sure there wasn't a 350 hp monsoon available in '99.

 

BTW, have ski'd a friend's Sunsetter LXI and love it. Was shopping for one but ended up with my RLXI, as the SSLXI's are very rare. As others have stated, be sure to get the diamond hull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
SSLXi is a better slalom and barefoot boat with out a doubt, I have been behind both a lot. Also depending on what barefoot speeds you want, the 205 is slow. WOT was usually 40/41 with a footer. Another thing to find out on the 205 is what was actually done to the motor, people use the term rebuild a lot and means drastically different things. I would want to see documentation on what was done and parts used. My brother has an 03 SSLXi and I have a 05 RLXi, my wake is better but not a huge difference and both run 46mph at WOT.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...