Jump to content

Comp Vest yes or no


LK_skier
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
Hi - I'm still not wearing a comp vest ... seems I go against the grain. Can someone tell me if there is a performance added value to wearing one? Or are they just more comfortable and hence give better performance? Are they safe? Im a bigger guy 235 lbs 6,4".... probably can't find one to fit me to be honest - but will it float me enough? thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
There will be some that fit you. But the question is, how comfortable are you in the water with one? How are your drivers? How hard do you fall when you crash? They’re comfortable to wear, but if you’re fine in you pfd, no need to switch.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
At 235, I have to think that a slalom vest would be a lot less bulky on an already big frame. You certainly will be able to get your elbows closer to your sides and that might be more comfortable. I think Eagle makes a XXL which would probably be about the right size. At 182 I wear a large and it’s a hair too big but a medium is a hair too small.

Lpskier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@FSSPCat Drivers are pretty good and on the ball, crash....hmmm generally I don't crash but there's always that one time. The PFD I wear is ok - but Im just starting to notice it now that I'm skiing a little more shorter line lengths - hard to describe... maybe its all in my head...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Not legal in Pennsylvania. Even on a private lake the your property rights stop at the waters edge. The Fish Commission can come in at any time. The only exception is a barefoot suit, or trick skiing. You still have to have a USCG approved vest on board for all passengers and skiers. The comp vests are too thin. I like having padding for those bad crashes. I have two Ski Warm/Connelly USCG neo vests.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Age old discussion. Will a comp vest float you as well. No . Will they float you enough? Maybe. Pro/Con - padding in a fall - no way to really prove marked results. IMO everyone should have a couple of each. I love comp vests - light feel and freedom of movement, no riding up. Don't want to spend a lot? I've snagged amazing deals on Eagle and Oneil vests on SIA and Ebay. Well under $50, to your door.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

There really isn’t a yes/no here due to safety implications. The situation and surroundings drives a lot of “what ifs”.

 

In a controlled environment, like a dedicated slalom lake, they can be sufficient to float you for starts and provide some impact protection. If you get knocked out, there is minimal depth and current so chances are it will be easy to assist you in an emergency.

 

When you get into more open waters, all of that control goes away. If the worst should happen, with a CGA vest you are at least floating and easy to find. With a comp vest that not guaranteed, I sink if I exhale while wearing mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I have no issue floating in a comp vest. If I get knocked out, I don't think it will be an issue keeping me at the top of the water. It won't keep my head up or face out of water, but I won't be out there alone, and the boat should be back quick enough. If your vest won't keep you on the top of the water, I would look at other options.

 

I find the impact claims interesting. I don't think there is any real testing or studies done to see exactly what approach is best for minimizing rib injuries. A CGA vest has more padding, but is that necessarily best, maybe thinner/stiffer foam are better? Some comp vests have smaller individual foam panels, others have larger. I would think the larger areas would help disperse the impact where the small panels may localize that impact into a smaller area. But, smaller panels provide more flexibility. There's a lot of speculation and theory as far as impact resistance, and some trade offs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
At 240+ lbs, the Stokes XXL was too big, went to an XL and after a season, it's almost too big. They float me fine, keeping in mind I ski on a made made lake. Depending who my driver/passengers are, I wouldn't wear one in open/public lakes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I am almost always the only one at the starting dock with an old fashioned, Coast Guard approved vest. But guess what, I am old and don't care what anybody else thinks. The old style vest floats me better and keeps my head out of the water when I shorten the line or fall. Yes, the comp vest is comfortable - I have tried a couple of them - but for me they are not as good. They are not really comfortable when you have to hold your nose up to breathe. My old fashioned CGA vest is more protective of the ribs (my opinion) and is not restrictive or a hindrance to me in any way. For icing on my cake, it costs about a third of what a comp vest costs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

Hey @LK_skier As a fellow bigger guy 6'8 295-310lbs If you are wanting to stick with a CGA, one of the best that we have in the shop right now, that we sell a ton of is called the Liquid Force Watson, a bit longer cut which is nice with being taller. I have plenty of comp/impact vests, O'Neill makes some great ones as well, the shop opens at 10 if you ever have any questions feel free to give us a call!

 

 

Performance Ski and Surf 

Mike@perfski.com

👾

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Just throwing in my $.02 and it's probably not worth that much. I'm not a big guy, 5'9" 155. And, I've just started skiing in the course a lot this past season. I was in a regular CGA jacket for the first half of the season. Then, I took a fall that resulted in some cracked ribs. So I purchased a comp vest, Eagle, for the tighter fit around my dinged up ribs. After a couple of weeks I was able to resume skiing. I do find the comp vest to be more comfortable and less bulky too. But, I can't say that I ski better with it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

If you are knocked down and breathless, you are going down. I do that at the drops while waiting... exhale and start sinking then at the last moment I take a deep breath and come up again...

I believe that a tight comp vest gives me a better chance to save my ribs in a bad fall than a bulky cga one, but as far as keeping you afloat in a knocked out fall, it’s not gonna work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
This summer I got a Stokes EVO2 comp vest - @Thomasasher was very helpful finding the right size for me (Large, fits me really well). The EVO doesn't make me float as well as my previous CG approved O'Neill vest and I had to make some adjustments getting out of the hole. Now I like it a lot and it allows me to keep my elbows closer to my waist. As for sinking, I tested it and it holds me on the surface.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I know this is a buoyancy conversation, but in terms of safety even CGA type III vests are not designed to turn an unconscious wearer.

 

“A TYPE III PFD, or FLOTATION AID, is good for calm, inland water, or where there is a good chance of quick rescue. This PFD type will not turn unconscious wearers to a face-up position. The wearer may have to tilt their head back to avoid turning face down.”

 

I’ve been through WSI training. CGA vests are required in MN on public water where we ski, but I choose to wear a comp vest (zipper plus 2 buckles) for early morning skiing with a trusted boat crew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...