MattP

@The_MS if you go outside the USA you can... IWWF does not regulate what year boats pull tournaments if I am not mistaken all they care about if the times are good..

@ghutch only a matter of time! Congrats!

@disland in my experience in my area the promo owners would more than likely waive this fee for college tournaments.

If it is his Email Larry to see if he can help or get the ad down. larryg@ski-it-again.com

Does "someone" have access to the SurePath data? I see the antenna in the video..

Been in Orlando since Thursday and not sure when I am leaving! Jodi threw a great event!!

https://www.instagram.com/p/CHfeZuxImnZ/?igshid=2qhtxg6zpdf1

Air 71 - Water 65 here in Atlanta today.

Who wore it best? @Horton or Farley?

@drew ill be in town in a few weeks. Would love to come try it out.

@Horton Britta is an Athlete Manager for Red Bull. ESPN 3 (online) carried the 2009 worlds in Canada if I remember correctly. I don’t remember the story of how that came about. I’m fine with any online platform that can carry skiing. It is the “future” I get the water sports channel on tv and they have a shot of Freddy jumping in their opening montage more than likely from a World Cup stop in Russia. I’m sure that relationship is long gone.

@Horton

This past weekend Dorien Llewellyn broke his previously held Canadian trick record of 11,260 by setting a new record of 11,460. This guy is on fire right now! Jaret his dad previously held the trick record and his brother Kreg held it before him. Tricking is in this guys blood! This coming off the previous week after he set a pending World Overall Record at Jacks. https://www.instagram.com/p/CGnuVEWh47V/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

@Luzz the ELO List is interesting I will need to read more into the documentation. http://www.iwsftournament.com/homologation/ELO%20Ranking%20System%20Description.pdf Have you or @Horton looked at this placement points based list? This looks to be more of how your new list is based but weights the tournaments differently and takes into account the number of competitors as well as and how they were ranked in the previous year. This seems to be somewhat of a combination of what our old list was doing but using all events and not just "pro" events. http://www.iwsftournament.com/homologation/DisplayRanking.php http://www.iwsftournament.com/homologation/IWWFPlacementRanking.pdf

@cruznski everyday. Scores are uploaded to the Rankings website, immediately upon receipt from the tournament scorer. Any newly reported or updated scores will show up immediately in Score Detail displays. However, the Ranking Scores are recalculated only once each day, during the overnight hours. As a result, any changes or additions to the score database on any given day, will not be reflected in the rankings until the following morning. @JeffSurdej sure lets put that on my plate too.. :)

@rico yes and no. Again it's JT, Jamie and pretty much Will's home site. If it was at Okee, Trophy, Bennetts, Bel Aqua, Shortline, Ski West, Cottonwood, Aquaplex where these skiers do not go frequently I would be way more suspect even though they are all world class sites.

@AdamCord so lock in the dynamic list for the day the "Pro" event hits the list.

@Horton I can get behind this idea. Are you using the dynamic or static list to create the skier value?

@Horton is this more of a variation of the BOS Ranking we once did but removes the IWWF scores? The idea with this list was to find a way to combine Backyard & Pro Events equally to find the best skier of the year who competed against the best skiers. It removed money from the equation which the elite list is based on and accounted for the fact that not every skier attends every event. Details on this list are on this thread > /forum#/discussion/comment/227196

@scoke again innocent until proven guilty. You must know something that I don’t. I have zero invested interest in this event or the site. I am just a bystander/skier/judge who thinks that just because people ski great we shouldn’t question their performance or the officials. Seems to be so common these days on this website. There should be a system of checks and balances. We have PanAm judges that are making sure IWWF rules are followed and we used to have out of region judges at record events to have another set of eyes on things. Should all L/R events be reviewed by a 3rd party TC & ECV Review or just the ones people on the internet think are off? Unless you or @Horton or whoever are going to come out and say you heard the driving was all over the place or the course was set narrow, long or the ropes were long then we should let the scores be what they are until they now more than likely will be reviewed. Let's hear the accusations instead of just saying that these skiers are incapable of these scores. I will be more than happy to send you and Horton beer if I am wrong. I'm sure a score or two may be thrown out due to driving tolerances but let's see if the 3 big players get their scores to stand. I will be the first to say I was wrong. I attend a few weekday tournaments a year that are run with a RC course, current boat and more than capable officials that usually turns out many PBs or close to it over the course of 3 rounds. To me it's the atmosphere that allows this. They are usually laid back no rush rush rush to ski and it allows the skier to perform at their highest.

@MISkier Yes. I have updated the sheet. Thanks.

@Horton to answer your question. 29 Slalom skiers (Out of 34 on the list) according to the ranking list posted 1 of their top 5 scores in a R/L in the rolling 12 months as of today. 16 of those was their top score to the list. of those 9 have 5 scores on the list, 1 have 4 scores, 4 have 3 scores, 2 have 2 scores, 0 have 1 score 11 of those was their 2nd top score to the list. 1 of those was their 3rd top score to the list. 1 of those was their 4th top score to the list. 0 of those was their 5th top score to the list. The data is HERE Scorebook HERE

@scoke more tongue and cheek, BUT we the people no longer have access to the ECV dropbox or I would have already looked. I know the driver and I trust his abilities. I know the site and I trust them to run a legit event. They are home to world championships & MLCQ among other high profile events. If there is something hinkey going on the powers that be should look into it and then downgrade or let the scores stand. All the appointed officials are reputable. Until there is evidence against the scores I have no problem backing them and the officials. This is the USA you are innocent until proven guilty.

Will Asher has run into 43 7 times since 2016. At Hancock, Trophy, Botas x2, Swiss, Travers x3. Pretty much does it once a year. Jon Travers has run into 43 5 times since 2013. At Travers x3, Swiss & Botas. Has 2 6 no continuations at 41 from Travers. Home site has its advantages!

@Horton I understand. Remember the dynamic list is not used for anything its just nice to have at current time. The bi-yearly IWWF static list is still used for worlds and the like. Both lists only take 1 score from the sanction. Doing it multiple times is moot. They also had the same score each time they got into 43. Regardless if they did it once or four times its still worth the same.