Jump to content

Big spray / Inefficiency?


JAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller
Wondering if ski designers look at spray patterns as they test new shapes and bottom textures. Considering conservation of energy, it has to go somewhere. My S2 seems to send a monster wall of water compared to Goode 9800.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
@JAS‌ I think it is a fun esoteric conversation topic but I would bet a case of beer that ski designers do not use spray height as a metric
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

For a beer, I will!

 

I certainly look at the spray to check things. Weird patterns indicate that some tuning is in order. Very weird spray might make me give up on a crappy ski. Or really go at it with the grinder. But a good ski can have big or tiny spray. I have found that the spray size is irrelevant to buoy count.

 

I do adjust the speed on tricks to make the spray right. But that's totally different.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@Horton I'm sure you are right, ski design process seems a little like that of a surf board shaper with good dose of reverse engineering. Lots of trial and error. Was watching GS ski racing video with commentary about minimal snow spray in turns = least amount of speed loss. We are constantly hearing about carrying speed through water ski turn, got me thinking.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Ever since the first stepped bottom ski I always wondered if ski companies test their skis in any type of flow bench, similar to a wind tunnel for cars.

 

I have long since forgotten much of my fluid dynamics classes but we did some lab experiments to look at the flow characteristics of different surfaces in pipes and open planes. It was interesting back then and makes me curious now that I have a practical application related to a hobby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
spray is converting skier energy into water displacement. It means you are sliding. That is not always a bad thing but the guy with the biggest spray may not get the biggest score.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

The boat has 300+ hp. Efficiency (small spray?) is irrelevant given how much energy is available. Snow skis only have gravity so efficiency matters. Big spray adds stability. Tradeoffs make spray a minor factor in how good a waterski feels.

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
Sprays are bigger when more of the ski is the water. That being said the old Mapples from 2001 put up a wall. Look at some old photos of Parrish in waterski mag. Maybe becouse it was the last is the tunnel design high end skis.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
How about mapping the curve of the upper edge of the spray? Moving out-bound with tight line after the edge change results in a slowly rising curve and efficient front foot carved finish gives an even topped long radius top curve to the end of the spray. (Probably needs an efficiency curve map dependent upon line length.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...