Jump to content

World championships slalom conditions


GaryWilkinson
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

Is it just me or are the Aussie announcers praise of the conditions at that HUGE lake in Malaysia a little overboard?

 

I like the content about the skiing, but their statements of how great it is doesn’t translate to the skiers and their performances. Many went down early due to what I saw as a course filled with distant rollers from boats on the same body of water in the distance. (You could see them in the distant view) And moderate backwash from the concrete sea wall across the bay.

 

Anyone else see this? It seems to me that the site is borderline acceptable for slalom, but who am I sitting here in Canada hoping for another month of good weather.

 

Anyone else see it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

It’s not only you.

I thought the same when I heard comments like “a little water movement” or “a bit challenging” and seen the best skiers in the world struggling, fighting and going down early. It’s a disgrace, no matter how nice the surrounding area is.

But what do you expect the official commentators to do? Criticize the site/venue/organizers while they are working there?

 

All had been discussed here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

There is some rollers especially at 4 and 6 when leaving from the starting dock.You can really see them in Jamie Bull 32 off at 3 ball coming from the middle of the lake.It almost took her down.

But on the other hand,Manon was able to run 3...Certainly not the usual private manmade lakes conditions but still skiable.

My ski finish in 16.95 but my ass is out of tolerance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
If the difficult conditions were the same for everyone that would be fine but when you introduce random rollers into the equation it creates a unfair situation. We all know that a roller at the finish of a slalom turn is not the same as one behind the boat in our lean.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I often hear how much we miss the Pro Tour and television coverage of waterskiing. The Pro Tour was often hosted on dicey sites. Skiers like the Duvalls, LaPoints, Roberge, Mapple, etc became legends carving out wins in crazy bad conditions. I think one has to weigh out the potential equation of conditions versus exposure. We don't want to see season ending injuries occur but those types of injuries happen in even the best of conditions. Every time we ski we take a risk. IDK, I think that if the winning pass is a line length longer than usual but we get to showcase our sport to thousands of spectators then it's OK. Moomba is harsh on the skiers and not consistent. Even Robin Lake gets rolly. Let the skiers ski!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
@Cooper_Trelawney a World Title is perhaps the single greatest achievement in a skiers career. Adding luck to the formula for winning detracts from the title.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
The site has its challenges, much like Moomba, and the same announcer was there too. He’s from New Zealand and they are a much tougher breed and different personality. “Hurricane? We’re getting a little rain!” He does a fantastic job! At least the trick scores were insane, that bubble is wild! We have been so ridiculously spoiled with our private lakes. The old Coors light ski tour had much crazier conditions and the announcers laughed ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@horton I completely agree that a World Title is the highest achievement one can earn but when you look at the history of the World Championships, they have often been held on open sites that can get rough. I don't know why. Just a few of those include 2017 Paris, 2011 Dubna Russia, 2007 and 1991 Austria, 1979 Toronto, 1977 Milan and going back and back...It seems that when the Worlds have been held at top sites such as Okaheelee or Clermont FL that the conditions are great but there is no viewership. It seems like a trade-off for sure. The '61 Worlds were in Long Beach, CA. Can you imagine that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
@jimbrake hopefully there will be a crowd for the finals but so far I have only seen other skiers on shore & in the stands in the webcast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Not so sure about the crowd numbers being more than skiers, friends and family.

I believe our sport unfortunately doesn’t draw to the public in general anymore.

 

When E-sports gets an online audience of tens of millions, tastes have changed. I believe the best we can get is a few thousand at the venue (hopefully) and maybe 10x that on line.

 

Saddens me to know and have to accept that.

 

Another thought is that other than jumping and tricking somewhat, the average Jill can’t tell the difference between one slalom run and another. Would it be that hard to make a graphic showing the handle distances and some illustrations, even demonstrations like Andy did at the end of his video a few years ago explaining how really difficult short-est line slalom passes really are?!

 

Back to my thread’s point, is that these are the f-ing WORLD championships brother! Shouldn’t we see the best at their best? The skiing audience at least, deserve better. The site obviously moves around unlike Moomba and Masters where there’s history there.

 

Let’s pick better sites so we (and the world) can see great skiing and not leave who gets into the finals on luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Try watching alpine slalom events...the quickest in round 1 have to ski last down the course that is rutted to hell in round 2 - true they have a time advantage, but the course is trashed by the time they get to it..

 

this is sport - you can’t always have perfect conditions all the time..these guys can ski in anything - they relish the challenge...world records don’t have to be set at the world champs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I am confused as to what happened with Nate. They said he missed his gates but then he was in a run off with Adam and Carlo and said he is in the finals? Was the missed gate just purely a mistake on the webcast?

 

@Chad_Scott You can see the grandstands in the mens prelim webcast where the top seeds were skiing and they were pretty empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@keithh2oskier Judges said Nate missed his gates at 39. There was video review and they gave 0@39. Nate protested and further video review overturn the decision and Nate scored 2.5@39 for a run off.

In the meantime, the webcast studied evidence frame by frame of Nate going through the gate but using 35 instead of 39.

So much fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Obrienslalom I was told they stopped the boat due to conditions. Apparently there were rollers that were worse than others.

 

@keithh2oskier after they sorted out the gate call, Nate was first in the run-off and ran 1.5@41 to advance. There were 3 skiers in the run-off for 2 spaces in the finals. It took Adam and Carlo 3 tries to decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...