countymountie

Should I go 30 3/16 or 30 5/16 for binder #s for a 68" . I know the published numbers say 301/4; however, the issue that I'm having with my Reflex plate has holes and won't give me the exact specs. FYI, I took the fin block off to get my measurements, I haven't been out on it yet. Am I making an issue out of a non-issue?

@mzito‌ I saw them on Radar's website attached to the Vapor info.

@ShaneH‌ ok, I can push my back foot up more like @Chef23‌ said, I'm just not sure I can get over the "looseness" if that makes any sense. Maybe I've been on doubles too long. It just feels so foreign now. IDK??

@mzito‌ Rossi also has different numbers if you use a RTP

Ok, I tried a set with the RTP and it ended in disaster. The worst I've skied in years. I don't think giving it more time is going to work . Just waste gas. Too much freedom of the back foot, too much distance between the Reflex and the RTP , coming from double Stradas that were jamed right next to each other. I have an old RS1 that I'm going to cut up and see how it works.

Mine will be here next week.

@Chef23‌ We are staying the 22nd - 26th

Jr. and I are going at the end of the month. This will make my third trip.

@eleeski‌ thanks for the info. Trying to switch back to a RTP on my first set of the season ended in disaster, hopefully I can heal up quick and get back on the water.

I was going to ask if it was feasible to put a Strada with a Reflex in front, I guess this post answers that. I tried going back to a RTP last week, got hurt, and thought about going back to doubles ( Reflex w/Strada). I did some quick measurements between the binders and I found that I needed at least 2" spacing to allow the Reflex to release properly. Although , cutting off the toe of the boot looks like the route to go.

@ricski39‌ yes, if I would have known it would be an issue I would have bought the aluminum frame. I didn't drill the ski, I just widened a couple of holes on the RTP like @Dirt mentioned and then reinforced with a small plate that I took off my Sequence plate. I'll ride on this setup for a couple of weeks until I get back in ski shape and then demo new skis. I'll probably get a couple more "Dislikes" for doing that. Oh well...

@MS No sir. When Radar started putting out skis, the back holes were closer together than HO's and Obriens. I still have an '09 Senate C that has the same hole pattern as my 55. It was never an issue before because I was using a Sequence Plate. I thinks Radar saw the error of their ways and now offers skis that can accommodate a wider variety of rear binders. However; with regards to my ordeal, Radar should be putting out a RTP that does not have to be modified to fit their own product. You can't defend that.

@Waternut‌ I noticed that some retailers have the carbon fiber Reflex plate is slotted in the back and appears that it has additional holes so you can move the rear block units forward in addition to the toe loop. The newer g-10 has the holes, no slots. @skialex‌ thanks with the good info, buying new ss washers will be a lot cheaper than buying a carbon fiber plate, I'll make it work. @oldjeep‌ it's an older Strada 55 that I'll be using for the next few weeks. I plan on demoing a Vapor and a Nano XT ASAP. I now see that Radar has stated putting 4 holes in the back of their current skis. It sure would have been nice if they make their binders compatible with all of their skis.

Why in the world am I forced to drill out extra holes on a Radar RTP to mount to a Radar ski? As you can see in the first pic, I had to drill extra holes in the back to accommodate Radar's narrow hole pattern. In the pic on the right, I ran into an issue with the back holes on my new Reflex. I have the binder set at 30" from the tail and I could barely squeeze the washers in next to the Reflex hardware . If my next ski requires a measurement closer than that I won't be able to fit in washer. Any suggestions? The back holes appear to be spaced about 1/8 apart, however the front and middle are slotted.

I picked a bracket up on SIA for my CIPA extreme mirror . It is very solid, nicely made and folds down great when I put on the cover.

@Wtrskior can you expand on that comment? Thanks Two completely different price points, new vs. used

Can't go wrong with Masterline. I have their radius handle. I'm going to be trying out the Radar Extend handle fitted with the triangle bar with their Vice gloves... it should give a heck of a grip!

Picked up my Reflex yesterday. I can't wait to try it out. I've been on a double boot set up for the past 6 years and will be going back to a RTP so it might be interesting.

I have a 2010 200 on a single axle Phoenix. Originally the trailer had 4 bunks, two in the back and two long one's for the front. Phoenix did a retro fit to the current six bunks that you see. I was also advised to put the trailer in deeper. So far, no issues. The odd thing is, once the boat is on the trailer, the two middle bunks do not make contact with the boat. The middle bunks were added as a means to guide the boat onto the front bunks and prevent hangup issues.

What length for 180 - 190 lbs, 5'8" , 32 mph. I was thinking on getting a 67 to replace my 67 Senate C ?? Now I'm not so sure. Thanks

Is the vapor more user friendly/ forgiving than the 13' Strada? I'm looking for a new ski and an wondering if it's worth the extra coin for the newer offering from Radar?

My opinion of BOS reviews and @Horton's objectivity from sponsors just went up. What I find curious is the R3 is descended from the Fisher which has received rave reviews since it was introduced to the market back when @Horton was involved in a semi-formal review process. My only understanding of the Fisher is that you better have some "pilot" skills..... which @15' I do not.

@triess warm it up in the microwave. You don't want it hot, just warm. I was able to get one on a Theory afew years back no problems. Now I use Eagle's ski sock with the built in tube.

I have the 24 volt Liftech. It's definitely the way to go.

I like the ability to run a Strada binder tight or a Power Shell.