This is getting heavy, but
Seems to me nearly everyone takes an L (by what I've read on this thread)
For a class R, which the Masters is, the tech wasn't complete. Towers weren't in the right place/cameras weren't in the right place
Judges weren't in the right place and they were missing judges (camera review)
Judges didn't judge. "I don't know" isn't an option--to be fair they weren't in a place to see buoy six live (?)
skier protested correctly, but didn't like the appeal (justifiably considering above⬆️)
LOC is overly sensitive/ not willing to admit they made a mistake. Skier expects R rules. Either both parties took a breath and worked toward a solution/ not making this mistake in the future, or they both crossed their arms and didn't budge.
Imho, the Masters is an Old School pro event and it shouldn't be an R tournament. The lake can't operate within R rules, and why try? Nobody is setting a world record on Robin Lake. "Back in My Day" ( and @Bruce_Butterfield and @liquid d) many pro tours were class C, or even F, because they were on lakes in business parks, etc, wherever they could get the most eyeballs. Today's pros should either accept that Masters is more about the show, or if they expect perfect class R conditions (and therefore rules) on Robin Lake, opt out. (Although they should expect R rules if it's registered as an R tournament...)