Gloersen

at 10.25?... :) good to hear you're back rippin' with a plate in your neck.

The relative risk is a Reflex FB release & a backfoot RB in scenario which may, e.g., occur after striking a turn ball. This being more likely with a conventional high-wrap. The rear Wiley, however, imo is a good choice in conjunction with a Reflex FB. The Wiley wrap can be adjusted to allow easy foot release, actually out of the box it allows predictable releases. Currently using a Strada RB laced moderately with a Reflex FB, having the tension release at upper limits; only a couple of nasty spills, but the releases have been rear, then Reflex. A few buoy strikes; both feet in. Whatever the choice, be reasonably confident it won’t result in a rear in/front out situation.

When Balling is a Calling Leave no Ball unturned....

6.865(tips)/2.516/.770(flat) out of the box. Reflex FB 29.25/Strada RB 17 Set 1: Good angle/direction off 2nd wake, a tad “slow”, over turning a bit out of heelside, 1 tail blow-out toeside. Set2: Reflex FB back 1 hole (~29.0625”) much improved vs. just acclimation. Like the way it rolls on edge out of the turn, keeps on moving, and gains angle. @Horton #'s noted in review (6.860/2.495/.770) Not inclined to change the fin setup frequently considering the block & at present good performance for debut. Nonetheless, it’s a lot of fin though, so inquiring for additional setup #’s from those finding success on this ride.

Inspirational & filthy. Must have been the ski (new Prophecy?)

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/10488512

It is very complex as Than points out. However the basic tenet that ΔV increases as the line shortens is perhaps good to conceptualize as a training aid, then again perhaps not; depends on one’s analytical nature. The spot crossing the course we VMax is probably of the essence. The skiers VMax is inextricably linked to the velocity of the rope along its vector and the tangential vector along which the handle travels at any given point. So VMax can certainly be at the 2nd wake if good technique is executed (handle control); if the tangential vector of the handle path to that of the rope is at an angle greater than when directly behind the boat such that the VHandle = [Cosine (rope angle) x VBoat] × 1/Cosine (ski direction angle)] product is relatively greater. Due to poor technique I’m quite certain that as the line shortens my VMax is before the 1st wake and my (ski angle direction) diminishes approaching the 2nd spray = bad = something upon which to focus for correction this Spring. Rather than “locking & loading” (static technique); creating the “velocity swing” (dynamic technique through the spray to spray work zone).

The format didn't come through; what appears as a 0 after symbols or 2 digit #'s below = "degrees". Just approximations, down course slide not considered. What about VRope? If: VRope = Rope Vector Velocity Ω0= Rope angle (to boat) VBoat = Boat Velocity Then: VRope = Cosine Ω0 × VBoat Ω0 = 900, Cosine Ω0 = 0 × 34 mph = VRope = 0 mph (rope speed at the buoy 41 off) Ω0 = 760, Cosine Ω0 = .242 × 34 mph = VRope = 8 mph (rope speed at the buoy 39.5 off) Ω0 = 690, Cosine Ω0 = .358 × 34 mph = VRope = 12 mph (rope speed at the buoy 38 off) Ω0 = 600, Cosine Ω0 = .500 × 34 mph = VRope = 17 mph (rope speed at the buoy 35 off) Ω0 = 00, Cosine Ω0 = 1.00 × 34 mph = VRope = 34 mph (rope speed behind the boat) What about VMax? Assume: VMax = VHandle = VSki (for the most part skier speed is equivalent to handle speed) Ψ0= Skier path angle Ω0= Rope angle (to boat) VHandle =VRope × 1/Cosine Ψ0 or VHandle = [Cosine Ω0 x VBoat] × 1/Cosine Ψ0 Assume Ψ = 530 behind boat (1/Cosine 530 = 1.701) Then: Vmax= 34 × 1.701 = 57 mph A 15 off skier probably doesn’t generate a 530 angle behind the boat, but for the sake of illustration if one assumes a skier path angle generated somewhere in that range, think about the ΔV required as the line shortens; 0 to 57 to 0 mph in 2.68 seconds at 41off, 34mph!! For that matter the ΔV’s at 35off are quite impressive!

Beauchesne. Accomplished & analytical; unique. Of all the pros witnessed at the Masters he always seems to be having the most fun in the face of fierce competition; that's what it's all about.

Old but accurate, no vague vernacular.

Old but accurate, no vague vernacular.

There are many sound reasons why the Professor invented the adjustable fin and many practical applications.

There are many sound reasons why the Professor invented the adjustable fin and many practical applications.

does it sink if holes are drilled in it?

Some may disagree; but it's more feasible to tune a slightly over-sized ski to ski shorter, rather than a slightly under-sized ski to ski longer. Additionally if the ski is slightly undersized, it may shut down a bit too early in the pre-turn. On the other hand it may be easier to sell a 66.5" if you decide to part with it, but at 190@34mph, I'd still go with the 67.5"...fwiw

Cambridge Crude Marine app may be far off, but the sooner the better with regard to "energy independence"

If you’re serious about ski tuning; let a qualified coach do it. Many on this forum will provide who are proficient. That said; it’s helpful to acquire the skill. Horton’s article is succinct & to the point. Schnitzer of course among the original innovators on the technique. Ski Tuning Get some good calipers, reproducible results specific to your equipment is more essential than comparing your #’s with those of others, although length using tips & depth should be comparable amongst measurements with good technique. The DFT is the least reproducible; investing in a Slot Caliper is prudent. Once the technique is mastered, tune the bindings/fin close to stock recommendations, depending on manufacturer/vendor (ime), shipped from the vendor doesn’t always mean the fin is even close to “stock” settings. After tuning; just “ski to the ski”. Video your sets; post here for critique (if you can take the flak hits). If you start ripping some good 32’s and then subsequently digress; check your setup (fin) & be certain no movement has occurred, unlikely but hitting a boat guide, a poorly machined fin block, etc. can result in changes. Recommend against the OCD of tuning the fin after every horrible set or less than expected results; heard there are some skiers out here that do that.

water temp ~70? zero balls up? 5/5/12 will be interesting!

Hideously fascinating; many skiers assume never have the handle that near to their arm.

Will Goode be 1st with nano "dermal denticles" on the bottom?

Actually John it probably is inappropriate, certainly won't lead to a higher buoy count; the primary objective of this site imo. It's January, slalomopaenia is setting in; it was somewhat entertaining though. regarding strategies to yield new PB's; a greater # of physically fit women participating would certainly help, but only if properly clad

Converting the depicted wakeboarders to slalom could incite growth...of some sort. Damn wakeboarders. This Link is Not Safe For Work / Do not watch with wife or children in the room www.creakyrowboat.com This Link is Not Safe For Work

While WCS vs Old School is passé and the info in this DVD certainly not slalom edict; the description of edge change transition is decent (not withstanding the "step behind counter rotation" jargon). Either way, it's fun to add to the confusion, 55k, 58k, etc.

Nate Smith How many consecutive tournament 39.5's?

Just carry it.