I am a live and let live guy, but here is my concern. 90 pulls is a full day of skiing for a one lake tournament. 30 skiers, three rounds each. Lets say we are going to have four MM skiers at a tournament who are going to ski three rounds of MM55 and three of MM56.5. Is it going to be a 102 pull tournament, adding at least an hour to an already long day for skiers, drivers, officials, etc? Or are we going to limit the entries to 26 skiers, 22 who get to ski three times and 4 who get to ski six? Are the MM skiers going to pay one entry fee or two? If we are keeping entries to 30, how are we going to ensure that everyone skis at least three rounds before running out of light? If I skied twice and lost my last round because it was dark, I'd be pretty pissed if some other guy skied six times. If I drove all the way from New York to Trophy and that happened, I would really pissed.
In reality, this won't effect me much because I ski most of my tournaments in the East and we have few MM guys. But I do go south, so I could be effected, therefore I feel free to voice my opinion. And in my opinion, if this will run the risk of negatively impacting any other skiers by time constraints, unreasonable lengthening of tournaments, limiting entries, or "we don't really have time for a full third round so you have to start the third round at the last full line length you ran in the second round", I am against it. If you want to do it at multi-lake sites where there will be no impact, and you don't mind paying two entries, and you can get enough drivers, boats, judges, scorers and safety personnel, have at it.
Or have I completely misunderstood the proposal, and you are suggesting that you would ski 2 rounds of one speed and a third of another? If THIS is the proposal, I have no opinion one way or the other.
John Wilkins