Jump to content

Slalom Course Fines - Wisconsin


epnault
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller

Hi WI Peeps - we got a $700+ ticket last weekend for leaving our portable insta-slalom course in the lake over night. The ticket states the course was obstructing a navigable waterway. Anyone have experience fighting this?

 

My first thought - obstruction, prove it!

 

The good thing is we have some smart people on our ski crew and one is an attorney! The actual law is kind of weak on this specific use (slalom course) and I think "obstruction of" can be argued since it sits 5' below the waterline (PVC pipes and lines) and people tube/ski/wake-board over it all day long. It doesn't obstruct any boats or any other use on the lake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

My inclination would be first to read up on the rules in the state. For one it looks like Wisconsin has a permit process. Do you have a permit to place the course?

 

If no - is there a law that permits the use of un-permit removable slalom courses?

 

My concern would be that attempting to fight a course if you didn't have a permit for the placement would be unwise. Particularly since you would be obstructing a waterway if it wasn't permitted...

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Oof that sucks, $700 is a steep fine. I feel your pain trying to course ski on a public lake, there's always something...

 

Was this right by the launch on your lake where everybody skis? If so, its kind of a dead end, shouldn't be much traffic there anyway.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
i got ticket on a Northern California lake for the same offense. The sheriff watched us ski it and didn't issue the ticket until we finished pulling it out. we only had it in for about 2 hours. judge didn't understand what a slalom course was and just threw it out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Not sure about in WI but in NH they keep a file on your course history of violations and complaints. Our permits have to be renewed each year. I know from talking to the Marine Patrol Sergeant that reviews all of the permit files in our area, you are better off paying and apologizing for the mistake.

 

In NH our permit explicitly states it must be submerged when not in use. I believe "waterway obstruction" is the generic fine category for us if we leave the course up past our permit hours. Our course is in a dead end cove tucked in against a shoreline with no houses as well. Marine patrol doesn't really care.

 

At least for us it's always better to just suck it up and pay it unless it is a grossly misrepresented. Like if we got ticketed during a time we didn't even have the course floating.

 

Not saying it is that way everywhere. Might be different in your area. Public lakes are a challenge for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Do they fine fishermen if they leave fishing markers in overnight? I don't think I've ever had a good experience with the WI DNR... They have more power than God and half of them don't know what the hell they're doing... like the one who rammed our dock once when dropping in to check on our registration. He hit it hard enough with his dumb aluminum boat that we had to re-set the legs after he left.

 

I used to have a signed letter from Tommy Thompson's office stating that portable courses are fine to be used without any permitting, but it was so long ago I can't remember if it said anything about taking it out at night. Wish I still had that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
I’m just curious, if there’s no permit for a portable course, then how do they know who to issue the ticket to? I mean for $700 you can buy a used course and leave that one to rot. Buoys fall off all the time, maybe pick the buoys out a few at a time when nobody’s looking? Essentially the course is abandoned garbage when nobody is skiing it. Does game warden pull the course and confiscate it and post a sign, “if you want course back you gotta pay fine”? What keeps you from dropping another course in 1000’ away and say “sorry game warden it’s not my course over there with the fine. I saw Rosie O’Donnell skiing it last week”?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

$700 is steep. Interesting the ticket was obstructing. From my experience I would expect unattended, obstructing possibly carried higher fine? We have been informed never to leave our course in unattended with out a permit in WI.

If the ticket was issued from a game warden I would expect they received a complaint or multiple complaints. In WI I believe ski course or race course are all viewed the same. I wish you the best of luck and hope the judge views it as excessive as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
While $700 is steep, just remember you are representing all course skiers now. I mean this with all due respect, but don't make something that isn't a huge issue into a big issue. The last thing we all need is giving the DNR a reason to cause us trouble.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@Niles Taylor I actually tried to reach out to USAWS a couple years to get help with understanding the laws around water rights and getting our slalom course permit restored. I'm a little sad to say they provided no help at all. I think this is definitely something they should help with if growth is an objective. sigh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Dang man that sucks! Things must've changed over the years, as the DNR guy that visited us on the chain about our Insta said we could leave it in for 7 days at a time. Did this happen at your lake?

 

Of course, this is the same WI DNR that planted a giant log fish crib in front of our dock, that was about 8'x8'x8', and just barely poked above the waterline. It could've easily tore up a number of props and lower units had my brother and I not dragged it out deep with the SN. Talk about an obstruction!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
The police on our lake in Canada stopped to check me for safety gear and talked about skiing the course we were parked beside years ago. I told him it was a different course, as I put this one in and offered him a pull after his shift. He declined, but definitely no fine!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a bummer, but good to know what the fine actually is. We're also in WI and have an EZ slalom course that we put out most weekends during the summer. 95% of the time we take it out at night (only to put it right back in the next morning), but there have been a couple times that we've left it in overnight.

 

Just a couple months ago we left it in overnight on a remote section of shoreline in front of state forest land (not our usual location). We figured no one would care because it wasn't in front of or next to any one's property and was in probably the most remote corner of the chain of lakes we're on.... We came back the next morning to find someone had cut the main line at one of the boat guide loops and dragged an entire section of the arms/bouys onto the shore...as frustrating as that situation was, I think I would still take it over a $700 fine though.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I also have an EZ Slalom course I splash in WI. It is pretty clear that it must be removed daily...

Permits are required for permanent courses.

 

HOWEVER, I think it’s worth fighting the dollar amount in court. And I’m not sure what your “due process” is in this matter. Might have to lawyer up in this case...

 

If you had a reason to leave the course in (sudden bad storm, or other issue) I think any reasonable person would either drop it or reduce the fine to a more manageable amount. A warning in my opinion would be more than enough.

 

However, common sense and reason has disappeared from our society.

 

JMHO....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've thought about petitioning the DNR to see if they're willing to change the requirement that temporary courses are removed at the end of the day and changing it to 48 hours. I don't see what the downside would be for the state and it would benefit everyone who puts out a portable course. I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people who put out a portable course do so primarily on the weekends and just want to leave it in the water overnight on Saturday.

 

I have little to no faith that would ever pass (common sense and reason), but I think it may be worth a shot...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
When I drop the course in our lake up north (way up north) it's not well received. In general people want to fish, pontoon around, and kayak and whatnot, and claiming 2000ft of the lake with buoys is a big request and imposition. I try to get it in and out as early and quickly as possible, I'd never leave it in. I remember one time I had just dropped it in and a small rowboat was motoring past it, the guy cussing about the course wildly to himself, not knowing it was so easy to hear across the lake. He was absolutely furious!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
You can get a big fine in MN as well. We had a sheriff visit us a few years back after leaving one in overnight at a rental place. Said we had to drop it or pull it out every night. That was the same year that we spent 2 or 3 days trying to find the course after we pulled all the balls and let it drop ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

A friend of mine had a course in Maryland and one of the stipulations was, when the course was floating someone had to be at the course. One skier floated the course then went to lunch leaving the course unattended. The punishment was they could not use the course for 1 month. I would rather pay a fine!

FYI, be very careful how hard you rock the boat. I would maybe let your attorney friend talk to them on a fact finding mission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
@oldjeep Seems to be impossible to hold in court. The only thing possibly proven is there’s a course in the water. Do they have joe on camera putting course in? Is it the responsibility of a random skier to do their homework and make sure joe’s course was properly permitted and legally installed before skiing it? How would Johnny Appleseed the skier know joe offender left the course in all night? Unless Cathy the Nosey Neighbor or Bobby the popo took picture of Joe Offender putting THAT course in and THAT course up at night, I can’t wrap my brain around who’s at fault or what can be proven unless there was admission of guilt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Orlando76 in WI, a slalom course in the water is a rarity. I guarantee he's the only house on his lake that puts one in, and if he's been putting it in for a couple years now everyone on the lake knows who the course belongs to, especially if the DNR warned him last year. They aren't exactly discreet...Like Jhughes said, courses here typically are not well received by the majority and I'd bet there is someone on his lake that is watching his every move waiting for them to break some rule to report them to the DNR. We have at least a couple people like that on our lake. So they know with 98% certainty that its his course, probably have some kind of proof that it was left in overnight, and they've already got the ticket... so what is he going to do, lie under oath in court?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Lake Associations have no governing power for bodies of water in Wisconsin.

They CAN implement a tax district for the the lake.

The DNR and Township (usually the township governs the body of water) in which the lake is located in have jurisdiction.

 

We just found out that our lake was closed by the township due to high water almost all summer. Ends up the township that claimed they had an ordinance allowing lake closure did not have an ordinance thus no power to close the lake. A resort on the lake lost over 100K in revenue due to the lake closure. Looks like there is a class action lawsuit against the township and board members coming down the pike. Normally board members are not subject to litigation, but in this case they willfully and knowingly acted inappropriately. As of now it kinda looks like the township is going to have to get the big boy checkbook out...will see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Orlando76 Spot on man. Me and the neighbor each have a course. We basically only ski when the course is in and the course is in a lot. We know we have some haters of skiers on the lake. They know who we are by first and last name. It is going to happen everywhere in the public world -some people want the world to work they think it should. I see all kinds of stupid (illegal crap) things done on our lake all the time but I am not going to turn someone in.

 

We broke the law, no doubt, however weak it is but the fine range is $10-$500. They are charging us way more than this.

 

https://law.justia.com/codes/wisconsin/2017/chapter-30/section-30.15/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Not knowing the population density of the county you live in nor the court arrangement but if you choose to fight it this is how it’s gonna go:

-The lowest level magistrate type judge will get this case along with ~75 other fine related cases that day. Mostly dirty foots who didn’t mow their grass this month and got fined and there’s undeniable picture and record etc. to prove it. Judge gonna spend ~8 minutes on your case.

-DNR will show up because he has nothing better to do, he’s proven this already. If he doesn’t, case is tossed.

-Unless there’s photographic evidence everything is circumstantial. Doesn’t matter there’s two guys that regularly ski the lake. Photographic Evidence you put course in then evidence you leaving course and evidence course was left overnight. Only likely way this was done if neighbor has a REALLY good security camera. Willing to bet once inThe water all our courses pretty much look the same.

-neighbor would have to testify.

-all parties involved will be given a window to arrive, say Monday, 8-12. How much of a hard-on does complaining neighbor have to take the day off and sit in a court lobby pacing back and fourth all day or sit on a wooden bench with a bunch of undesirables?

-doubtful judge gives .02

-and as mentioned what were the weather conditions day course was left in? Mother Nature when on a water way trumps all laws. Does evidence show favorable conditions?

 

Remember, OJ walked and so did Casey Anthony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

When I got my last speeding ticket (in a school zone) about 15-20 years ago, I went in to fight it. The officer did not show and it was tossed. You could try that and, if the officer does show and you aren’t planning on any perjury, then use that time to plead for mercy on the amount of the fine.

 

Of course, you are investing your time for this, so you have to weigh that.

The worst slalom equipment I own is between my ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Our ski partner showed up for a plea hearing (not guilty) last week and then today for the pre-trail. The prosecution needed to prove that the slalom course was obstructing a navigable waterway. They threw out the ticket and the fine.

 

What was revealed, not a surprise, is that many people are complaining about our amount of skiing and the course. The sad thing is based on some of the complaints we believe it may be people we call friends on the lake :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@epnault if someone had a way to reference it - it is atleast a case in which someone could show that they did not show that it was a barrier to navigation.

 

The last sentence is exactly why we don't straight pipe ski boats - doesn't matter if your neighbors are friends eventually you'll piss them off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...